[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0f55093-585f-4270-8ced-2c92a4808c9b@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 14:30:49 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>, rfoss@...nel.org,
todor.too@...il.com, agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
mchehab@...nel.org, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
andrey.konovalov@...aro.org
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/13] media: qcom: camss: Allow clocks vfeN vfe_liteN
or vfe_lite
On 17.08.2023 16:38, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> The number of Video Front End - VFE or Image Front End - IFE supported
> with new SoCs can vary both for the full and lite cases.
>
> For example sdm845 has one vfe_lite and two vfe interfaces with the vfe
> clock called simply "vfe_lite" with no integer postfix. sc8280xp has four
> vfe and four vfe lite blocks.
>
> We need to support the following clock name formats
>
> - vfeN
> - vfe_liteN
> - vfe_lite
>
> with N being any reasonably sized integer.
>
> There are two sites in this code which need to do the same thing,
> constructing and matching strings with the pattern above, so encapsulate
> the logic in one function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
> index 8f48401e31cd3..73380e75dbb22 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
> @@ -437,6 +437,20 @@ void vfe_isr_reset_ack(struct vfe_device *vfe)
> complete(&vfe->reset_complete);
> }
>
> +static int vfe_match_clock_names(struct vfe_device *vfe,
> + struct camss_clock *clock)
> +{
> + char vfe_name[CAMSS_RES_MAX];
VFE_MAX?
the current value of 17 would be very excessive for VFEs!
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists