[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230818161038.GB986605@google.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 17:10:38 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Benjamin Bara <bbara93@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>,
peng.fan@....nxp.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
Jerome Neanne <jneanne@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@...data.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] mfd: tps65219: Specify restart mode
On Wed, 09 Aug 2023, Benjamin Bara wrote:
> From: Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@...data.com>
>
> The current restart handler registration does not specify whether the
> restart is a cold or a warm one. Instead, cold ones are typically
> registered with a HIGH prio. Now, as do_kernel_restart() knows about the
> type, the priorization is implicitly done (cold restarts are executed
> first) and the reboot_mode kernel parameter (which is currently mostly
> ignored) can be respected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@...data.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - improve commit message
> ---
> drivers/mfd/tps65219.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
> index 0e0c42e4fdfc..85752b93256e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c
> @@ -278,12 +278,21 @@ static int tps65219_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> }
> }
>
> - ret = devm_register_restart_handler(tps->dev,
> - tps65219_restart_handler,
> - tps);
> + ret = devm_register_cold_restart_handler(tps->dev,
> + tps65219_restart_handler,
> + tps);
>
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(tps->dev, "cannot register restart handler, %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(tps->dev, "cannot register cold restart handler, %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = devm_register_warm_restart_handler(tps->dev,
> + tps65219_restart_handler,
> + tps);
> +
Sorry, why do we have to now register 2 restart handlers?
Seems like a regression?
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(tps->dev, "cannot register warm restart handler, %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists