lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:11:55 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Nícolas F. R. A. Prado 
        <nfraprado@...labora.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, kernelci@...ts.linux.dev,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] kselftest: Add new test for detecting unprobed
 Devicetree devices

On 8/18/23 09:08, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 01:54:21PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 07:35:27PM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
>>
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/dt/ktap_helpers.sh
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>> +#
>>> +# Copyright (c) 2023 Collabora Ltd
>>> +#
>>> +# Helpers for outputting in KTAP format
>>> +#
>>
>> These look generic so could be at the top level kselftest directory in
>> case any other tests want to use them?
> 
> Yes, they're generic. And sure, we can move it up. The tests using it will need
> to source it at run-time, so we can either update the kselftest Makefile to
> always copy this helper when installing, or each test's Makefile can
> make its own copy during build.
> 

Moving this up would require the above changes. I prefer
making these later after this test goes in to avoid conflicts
with linux-kselftest next and Rob's dt as this one depends
on  patches 1&2 which aren't in my Inbox.

I would like also  to see a common solution that works for C
and shell tests. Sourcing works just for shell tests.

>>
>> The test itself looks good in so far as I can read shell.
> 
> Thanks for the feedback!
>
Rob, Are you planning to take this through your tree. If you
do, here is my Reviewed-by

Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ