linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] Add add-maintainer.py script

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6f475c9b-dc0e-078e-9aa2-d876a1e02467@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 19 Aug 2023 09:50:56 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
Cc:     Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] Add add-maintainer.py script

On 18/08/2023 21:46, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>>
>>> With this script, the workflow would be as simple as:
>>>
>>>   1. Generate patches using `git format-patch`
>>>   2. Run `add-maintainer.py` on the above patches
>>>   3. `git send-email` the patches.
>>
>> So one more unnecessary step (2). I don't think it is easier than my
>> workflow.
>>
>> I just do only 1 and 3 and that's it. The simplest way ever.
>>
> 
> There's no get_maintainer.pl in either 1, or 3, so obviously this isn't
> the only thing you do.
> 
> Thanks for the link to your alias below, it's now clear that you don't
> need an extra step in the procedure, if you only have your extra wrapper
> around step 3.
> 
> 
> I now also understand why you never ever have a cover-letter, something
> Guru's proposed flow handles quite nicely.

It's not related. I usually don't create cover letter from laziness, but
pretty often I create them as well and my script/alias works there
perfectly. Cover letter is just one more step:
1. git branch --edit-description
2. git format-patch --cover-letter (with format.coverFromDescription =
subject in gitconfig)
3. git_send_email 0*

No need to run any other tool, no need to add any maintainer entries
(unless touching defconfig and specific soc@ stuff, but this is always
the case regardless of tools).

Really, that script proposed here is the unnecessary step.

Rob's approach with git send-email identity required some work for
cover-letter, but it was also running get_maintainer.pl per each patch,
so recipients did not receive everything. Unless patchset is big, I
prefer to send everything to everyone.

> 
> 
> That said, b4 prep and b4 send seems like a better suggestion to those
> who doesn't already have a workflow in place.

Yes.


Best regards,
Krzysztof