[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW7d4cMi_FAtvyTn4HJWzRdocJaEVq-uYVcW43=JDE_EnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 08:22:50 -0700
From: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Francis Laniel <flaniel@...ux.microsoft.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] tracing/kprobe: Add multi-probe support for
'perf_kprobe' PMU
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 6:16 PM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 14:20:33 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 20:13:43 +0200
> > Francis Laniel <flaniel@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > Le vendredi 18 août 2023, 17:41:41 CEST Steven Rostedt a écrit :
> > > > On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 21:37:05 +0900
> > > >
> > > > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > > That's why perf probe uses the offset from '_text'. Normal KASLR will just
> > > > > moves all symbols. (Finer one will move all symbols randomely)
> > > > > This should not need to access /proc/kallsyms but vmlinux or SystemMap.
> > > >
> > > > We could just pass in: "_text+offset" too.
> > >
> > > So, the idea would be to change the existing create_local_trace_kprobe() and
> > > above functions to indicate the user's offset is to be used against _text and
> > > not address?
> >
> > No, not to modify that function, but if you know the offset from _text (via
> > the vmlinux), you can easily calculate it for that function.
>
> Note that the kprobe-event PMU interface itself allows you to specify
> FUNC+OFFSET style;
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20171206224518.3598254-5-songliubraving@fb.com/
>
> perf_event_attr::kprobe_func = "_text";
> perf_event_attr::probe_offset = OFFSET;
>
> Then, it should be able to specify the correct one. Of course you can use
> other unique symbols around the target symbol.
Trying to catch up with the thread.
Besides the CAP_* issue, we can do this with
perf_event_attr::kprobe_func = NULL;
perf_event_attr::kprobe_addr = address;
Then for the CAP_*, I think we should give CAP_PERFMON access to
/proc/kallsyms. Would this work?
Thanks,
Song
Powered by blists - more mailing lists