| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <SJ0PR12MB5676F7D0749A35DCB185452EA018A@SJ0PR12MB5676.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 20:11:11 +0000
From: Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@...dia.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
CC: "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"ilkka@...amperecomputing.com" <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@...dia.com>,
Richard Wiley <rwiley@...dia.com>,
Eric Funsten <efunsten@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] perf: arm_cspmu: Separate Arm and vendor module
Hi Suzuki,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 6:29 AM
> To: Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@...dia.com>; robin.murphy@....com;
> ilkka@...amperecomputing.com; catalin.marinas@....com; will@...nel.org;
> mark.rutland@....com
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> tegra@...r.kernel.org; Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>; Jonathan
> Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>; Vikram Sethi <vsethi@...dia.com>; Richard
> Wiley <rwiley@...dia.com>; Eric Funsten <efunsten@...dia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] perf: arm_cspmu: Separate Arm and vendor module
>
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On 05/07/2023 11:47, Besar Wicaksono wrote:
> > Arm Coresight PMU driver consists of main standard code and
> > vendor backend code. Both are currently built as a single module.
> > This patch adds vendor registration API to separate the two to
> > keep things modular. The main driver requests each known backend
> > module during initialization and defer device binding process.
> > The backend module then registers an init callback to the main
> > driver and continue the device driver binding process.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@...dia.com>
>
> Apologies for the delay.
>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes from v4:
> > * Fix warning reported by kernel test robot
> > v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20230620041438.32514-1-
> bwicaksono@...dia.com/T/#u
> >
> > Changes from v3:
> > * Move impl registration module back to main driver module.
> > * Rebase from will (for-next/perf)
> > Thanks to Robin for the feedback.
> > v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20230505005956.22837-1-
> bwicaksono@...dia.com/T/#u
> >
> > Changes from v2:
> > * Move sysfs_event/format_show definition to arm_cspmu.h and move
> impl
> > registration API definition to a separate module so main driver and vendor
> > module are independent.
> > * The registration API now just sets the impl_init_ops callback, no reprobe.
> > * Add PMIIDR table that maps to the vendor module name. During device
> probe,
> > main driver requests the vendor module if PMIIDR is matching.
> > * Keeping the name of the main driver module as arm_cspmu_module.
> > Thanks to Robin and Suzuki for the feedback.
> > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20230418062030.45620-1-
> bwicaksono@...dia.com/T/#u
> >
> > Changes from v1:
> > * Added separate Kconfig entry for nvidia backend
> > * Added lock to protect accesses to the lists
> > * Added support for matching subset devices from a vendor
> > * Added state tracking to avoid reprobe when a device is in use
> > Thanks to Suzuki for the feedback.
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20230403163905.20354-1-
> bwicaksono@...dia.com/T/#u
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig | 9 +-
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile | 6 +-
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 166
> +++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 24 +++-
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/nvidia_cspmu.c | 34 +++++-
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/nvidia_cspmu.h | 17 ---
> > 6 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/nvidia_cspmu.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
> b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
> > index 25d25ded0983..d5f787d22234 100644
> > --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
> > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > #
> > -# Copyright (c) 2022, NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES. All rights
> reserved.
> > +# Copyright (c) 2022-2023, NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES. All rights
> reserved.
> >
> > config ARM_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU
> > tristate "ARM Coresight Architecture PMU"
> > @@ -10,3 +10,10 @@ config ARM_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU
> > based on ARM CoreSight PMU architecture. Note that this PMU
> > architecture does not have relationship with the ARM CoreSight
> > Self-Hosted Tracing.
> > +
> > +config NVIDIA_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU
> > + tristate "NVIDIA Coresight Architecture PMU"
> > + depends on ARM_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU
> > + help
> > + Provides NVIDIA specific attributes for performance monitoring unit
> > + (PMU) devices based on ARM CoreSight PMU architecture.
> > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile
> b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile
> > index fedb17df982d..0309d2ff264a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile
> > @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> > -# Copyright (c) 2022, NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES. All rights
> reserved.
> > +# Copyright (c) 2022-2023, NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES. All rights
> reserved.
> > #
> > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >
> > obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU) +=
> arm_cspmu_module.o
> > -arm_cspmu_module-y := arm_cspmu.o nvidia_cspmu.o
> > +arm_cspmu_module-y := arm_cspmu.o
> > +
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_NVIDIA_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU) +=
> nvidia_cspmu.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> > index e2b7827c4563..04be94b4aa48 100644
> > --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
> > * The user should refer to the vendor technical documentation to get
> details
> > * about the supported events.
> > *
> > - * Copyright (c) 2022, NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES. All rights
> reserved.
> > + * Copyright (c) 2022-2023, NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES. All rights
> reserved.
> > *
> > */
> >
> > @@ -26,11 +26,11 @@
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >
> > #include "arm_cspmu.h"
> > -#include "nvidia_cspmu.h"
> >
> > #define PMUNAME "arm_cspmu"
> > #define DRVNAME "arm-cs-arch-pmu"
> > @@ -112,11 +112,10 @@
> > */
> > #define HILOHI_MAX_POLL 1000
> >
> > -/* JEDEC-assigned JEP106 identification code */
> > -#define ARM_CSPMU_IMPL_ID_NVIDIA 0x36B
> > -
> > static unsigned long arm_cspmu_cpuhp_state;
> >
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(arm_cspmu_lock);
> > +
> > static struct acpi_apmt_node *arm_cspmu_apmt_node(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > return *(struct acpi_apmt_node **)dev_get_platdata(dev);
> > @@ -373,27 +372,37 @@ static struct attribute_group
> arm_cspmu_cpumask_attr_group = {
> > .attrs = arm_cspmu_cpumask_attrs,
> > };
> >
> > -struct impl_match {
> > - u32 pmiidr;
> > - u32 mask;
> > - int (*impl_init_ops)(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu);
> > -};
> > -
> > -static const struct impl_match impl_match[] = {
> > +static struct arm_cspmu_impl_match impl_match[] = {
> > {
> > - .pmiidr = ARM_CSPMU_IMPL_ID_NVIDIA,
> > - .mask = ARM_CSPMU_PMIIDR_IMPLEMENTER,
> > - .impl_init_ops = nv_cspmu_init_ops
> > + .module_name = "nvidia_cspmu",
> > + .pmiidr_val = ARM_CSPMU_IMPL_ID_NVIDIA,
> > + .pmiidr_mask = ARM_CSPMU_PMIIDR_IMPLEMENTER,
> > + .module = NULL,
> > + .impl_init_ops = NULL,
> > },
> > - {}
> > + {0}
> > };
> >
> > +static struct arm_cspmu_impl_match *arm_cspmu_impl_match_get(u32
> pmiidr)
> > +{
> > + struct arm_cspmu_impl_match *match = impl_match;
> > +
> > + for (; match->pmiidr_val; match++) {
> > + u32 mask = match->pmiidr_mask;
> > +
> > + if ((match->pmiidr_val & mask) == (pmiidr & mask))
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return match;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int arm_cspmu_init_impl_ops(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> > {
> > - int ret;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops *impl_ops = &cspmu->impl.ops;
> > struct acpi_apmt_node *apmt_node = arm_cspmu_apmt_node(cspmu-
> >dev);
> > - const struct impl_match *match = impl_match;
> > + struct arm_cspmu_impl_match *match;
> >
> > /*
> > * Get PMU implementer and product id from APMT node.
> > @@ -405,16 +414,31 @@ static int arm_cspmu_init_impl_ops(struct
> arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> > readl(cspmu->base0 + PMIIDR);
> >
> > /* Find implementer specific attribute ops. */
> > - for (; match->pmiidr; match++) {
> > - const u32 mask = match->mask;
> > + match = arm_cspmu_impl_match_get(cspmu->impl.pmiidr);
> > +
> > + /* Load implementer module and initialize the callbacks. */
> > + if (match) {
> > + mutex_lock(&arm_cspmu_lock);
> > +
> > + if (match->impl_init_ops) {
> > + if (try_module_get(match->module)) {
> > + cspmu->impl.match = match;
> > + ret = match->impl_init_ops(cspmu);
> > + module_put(match->module);
> > + } else {
> > + WARN(1, "arm_cspmu failed to get module: %s\n",
> > + match->module_name);
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + request_module_nowait(match->module_name);
> > + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + }
> >
> > - if ((match->pmiidr & mask) == (cspmu->impl.pmiidr & mask)) {
> > - ret = match->impl_init_ops(cspmu);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > + mutex_unlock(&arm_cspmu_lock);
> >
> > - break;
> > - }
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > /* Use default callbacks if implementer doesn't provide one. */
> > @@ -478,11 +502,6 @@ arm_cspmu_alloc_attr_group(struct arm_cspmu
> *cspmu)
> > struct attribute_group **attr_groups = NULL;
> > struct device *dev = cspmu->dev;
> > const struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops *impl_ops = &cspmu->impl.ops;
> > - int ret;
> > -
> > - ret = arm_cspmu_init_impl_ops(cspmu);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return NULL;
> >
> > cspmu->identifier = impl_ops->get_identifier(cspmu);
> > cspmu->name = impl_ops->get_name(cspmu);
> > @@ -1129,6 +1148,11 @@ static int arm_cspmu_get_cpus(struct
> arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> > return arm_cspmu_acpi_get_cpus(cspmu);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline struct module *arm_cspmu_get_module(struct arm_cspmu
> *cspmu)
> > +{
> > + return (cspmu->impl.match) ? cspmu->impl.match->module :
> THIS_MODULE;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int arm_cspmu_register_pmu(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> > {
> > int ret, capabilities;
> > @@ -1149,7 +1173,7 @@ static int arm_cspmu_register_pmu(struct
> arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> >
> > cspmu->pmu = (struct pmu){
> > .task_ctx_nr = perf_invalid_context,
> > - .module = THIS_MODULE,
> > + .module = arm_cspmu_get_module(cspmu),
>
> We are accessing the module field without the mutex and the
> impl.match->module could be reset ?
Good catch, it will be fixed on v6.
>
> > .pmu_enable = arm_cspmu_enable,
> > .pmu_disable = arm_cspmu_disable,
> > .event_init = arm_cspmu_event_init,
> > @@ -1196,6 +1220,10 @@ static int arm_cspmu_device_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > + ret = arm_cspmu_init_impl_ops(cspmu);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > ret = arm_cspmu_register_pmu(cspmu);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> > @@ -1300,6 +1328,80 @@ static void __exit arm_cspmu_exit(void)
> > cpuhp_remove_multi_state(arm_cspmu_cpuhp_state);
> > }
> >
> > +int arm_cspmu_impl_register(const struct arm_cspmu_impl_match
> *impl_match)
> > +{
> > + struct arm_cspmu_impl_match *match;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + match = arm_cspmu_impl_match_get(impl_match->pmiidr_val);
> > +
> > + if (match) {
> > + mutex_lock(&arm_cspmu_lock);
> > +
> > + if (!match->impl_init_ops) {
> > + match->module = impl_match->module;
> > + match->impl_init_ops = impl_match->impl_init_ops;
> > + } else {
> > + /* Broken match table may contain non-unique entries */
> > + WARN(1, "arm_cspmu backend already registered for module:
> %s, pmiidr: 0x%x, mask: 0x%x\n",
> > + match->module_name,
> > + match->pmiidr_val,
> > + match->pmiidr_mask);
> > +
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&arm_cspmu_lock);
> > +
> > + if (!ret)
> > + ret = driver_attach(&arm_cspmu_driver.driver);
> > + } else {
> > + pr_err("arm_cspmu reg failed, unable to find a match for pmiidr:
> 0x%x\n",
> > + impl_match->pmiidr_val);
> > +
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_cspmu_impl_register);
> > +
> > +static int arm_cspmu_match_device(struct device *dev, const void *match)
> > +{
> > + struct arm_cspmu *cspmu =
> platform_get_drvdata(to_platform_device(dev));
> > +
> > + return (cspmu && cspmu->impl.match == match) ? 1 : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void arm_cspmu_impl_unregister(const struct arm_cspmu_impl_match
> *impl_match)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + struct arm_cspmu_impl_match *match;
> > +
> > + match = arm_cspmu_impl_match_get(impl_match->pmiidr_val);
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(!match);
> > +
> > + if (match) {
> > + /* Unbind the driver from all matching backend devices. */
> > +dev_release:
> > + dev = driver_find_device(&arm_cspmu_driver.driver, NULL,
> > + match, arm_cspmu_match_device);
> > + if (dev) {
> > + device_release_driver(dev);
> > + goto dev_release;
> > + }
>
> minor nit: We could simply do :
>
> static int arm_cspmu_release_driver(struct device *dev, void *data)
> {
> struct arm_cspmu *cspmu =
> platform_get_drvdata(to_platform_device(dev));
>
> if (cspmu && cspmu->impl.match == match)
> device_release_driver(dev);
> return 0;
> }
>
> ret = driver_for_each_device(&driver, NULL, match,
> arm_csmpu_release_driver);
>
It doesn’t seem to work for me.
Is it safe to release while iterating via driver_for_each_device ?
Regards,
Besar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists