[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ab95561-cfd2-f278-7dfd-fb35b00b7371@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 23:46:58 +0530
From: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <arunpravin.paneerselvam@....com>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
"Prosyak, Vitaly" <Vitaly.Prosyak@....com>,
"Sharma, Shashank" <Shashank.Sharma@....com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Felix.Kuehling@....com, daniel@...ll.ch, airlied@...il.com,
Xinhui.Pan@....com, alexander.deucher@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] drm/amdgpu: Explicitly add a flexible array at the
end of 'struct amdgpu_bo_list' and simplify amdgpu_bo_list_create()
Hi Christian,
I ran GLMark2, unigine heaven and Tomb Raider on steam. I didn't observe
any issues.
Regards,
Arun.
On 8/21/2023 4:33 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 20.08.23 um 11:51 schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
>> This serie simplifies amdgpu_bo_list_create() and usage of the 'struct
>> amdgpu_bo_list'.
>
> Oh, yes please. That's something I always wanted to cleanup as well.
>
>> It is compile tested only.
>
> That bothers me a bit. Arun, Vitaly, Shashank can anybody with time
> run a quick test on this? Preferable the IGT tests, but this just some
> game should probably do as well.
>
> Apart from that looks good to me,
> Christian.
>
>>
>> Christophe JAILLET (4):
>> drm/amdgpu: Explicitly add a flexible array at the end of 'struct
>> amdgpu_bo_list'
>> drm/amdgpu: Remove a redundant sanity check
>> drm/amdgpu: Remove amdgpu_bo_list_array_entry()
>> drm/amdgpu: Use kvzalloc() to simplify code
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c | 15 ++-------------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.h | 18 ++++++------------
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists