| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202308220205.gbt5lcAY-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 02:38:12 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: add reset bits for MT7988
Hi Daniel,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on linux-next/master]
[cannot apply to net/main linus/master v6.5-rc7]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Daniel-Golle/net-ethernet-mtk_eth_soc-add-reset-bits-for-MT7988/20230821-102205
base: linux-next/master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b983a3adf5184a30e4ce620fbbf028c9c76648ae.1692382239.git.daniel%40makrotopia.org
patch subject: [PATCH net] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: add reset bits for MT7988
config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230822/202308220205.gbt5lcAY-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230822/202308220205.gbt5lcAY-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308220205.gbt5lcAY-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:31:
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c: In function 'mtk_hw_reset':
>> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:3625:50: error: 'MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE1'?
3625 | if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h:1022:53: note: in definition of macro 'MTK_HAS_CAPS'
1022 | #define MTK_HAS_CAPS(caps, _x) (((caps) & (_x)) == (_x))
| ^~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:3625:50: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
3625 | if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h:1022:53: note: in definition of macro 'MTK_HAS_CAPS'
1022 | #define MTK_HAS_CAPS(caps, _x) (((caps) & (_x)) == (_x))
| ^~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c: In function 'mtk_hw_warm_reset':
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:3673:50: error: 'MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE1'?
3673 | if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h:1022:53: note: in definition of macro 'MTK_HAS_CAPS'
1022 | #define MTK_HAS_CAPS(caps, _x) (((caps) & (_x)) == (_x))
| ^~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c: In function 'mtk_prepare_for_reset':
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:4042:50: error: 'MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE1'?
4042 | if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h:1022:53: note: in definition of macro 'MTK_HAS_CAPS'
1022 | #define MTK_HAS_CAPS(caps, _x) (((caps) & (_x)) == (_x))
| ^~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c: In function 'mtk_pending_work':
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:4113:50: error: 'MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE1'?
4113 | if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h:1022:53: note: in definition of macro 'MTK_HAS_CAPS'
1022 | #define MTK_HAS_CAPS(caps, _x) (((caps) & (_x)) == (_x))
| ^~
vim +3625 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
3611
3612 static void mtk_hw_reset(struct mtk_eth *eth)
3613 {
3614 u32 val;
3615
3616 if (mtk_is_netsys_v2_or_greater(eth))
3617 regmap_write(eth->ethsys, ETHSYS_FE_RST_CHK_IDLE_EN, 0);
3618
3619 if (mtk_is_netsys_v3_or_greater(eth)) {
3620 val = RSTCTRL_PPE0_V3;
3621
3622 if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE1))
3623 val |= RSTCTRL_PPE1_V3;
3624
> 3625 if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2))
3626 val |= RSTCTRL_PPE2;
3627
3628 val |= RSTCTRL_WDMA0 | RSTCTRL_WDMA1 | RSTCTRL_WDMA2;
3629 } else if (mtk_is_netsys_v2_or_greater(eth)) {
3630 val = RSTCTRL_PPE0_V2;
3631
3632 if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE1))
3633 val |= RSTCTRL_PPE1;
3634 } else {
3635 val = RSTCTRL_PPE0;
3636 }
3637
3638 ethsys_reset(eth, RSTCTRL_ETH | RSTCTRL_FE | val);
3639
3640 if (mtk_is_netsys_v3_or_greater(eth))
3641 regmap_write(eth->ethsys, ETHSYS_FE_RST_CHK_IDLE_EN,
3642 0x6f8ff);
3643 else if (mtk_is_netsys_v2_or_greater(eth))
3644 regmap_write(eth->ethsys, ETHSYS_FE_RST_CHK_IDLE_EN,
3645 0x3ffffff);
3646 }
3647
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists