[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61cb0511b15612f43f390c750d2e9325bd7af4dd.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 12:19:40 -0700
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: bristot@...hat.com, bsegall@...gle.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
hdanton@...a.com, ionela.voinescu@....com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
len.brown@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mgorman@...e.de,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, ricardo.neri@...el.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, v-songbaohua@...o.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, vschneid@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
yangyicong@...ilicon.com, yu.c.chen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Add SMT4 group_smt_balance handling
On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 15:06 +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> >
> > From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> > Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 16:09:30 -0700
> > Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Add SMT4 group_smt_balance handling
> >
> > For SMT4, any group with more than 2 tasks will be marked as
> > group_smt_balance. Retain the behaviour of group_has_spare by marking
> > the busiest group as the group which has the least number of idle_cpus.
> >
> > Also, handle rounding effect of adding (ncores_local + ncores_busy)
> > when the local is fully idle and busy group has more than 2 tasks.
> > Local group should try to pull at least 1 task in this case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/fair.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index a87988327f88..566686c5f2bd 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -9563,7 +9563,7 @@ static inline long sibling_imbalance(struct lb_env *env,
> > imbalance /= ncores_local + ncores_busiest;
> >
> > /* Take advantage of resource in an empty sched group */
> > - if (imbalance == 0 && local->sum_nr_running == 0 &&
> > + if (imbalance <= 1 && local->sum_nr_running == 0 &&
> > busiest->sum_nr_running > 1)
> > imbalance = 2;
> >
> > @@ -9751,6 +9751,20 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
> > break;
> >
> > case group_smt_balance:
> > + /* no idle cpus on both groups handled by group_fully_busy below */
> > + if (sgs->idle_cpus != 0 || busiest->idle_cpus != 0) {
> > + if (sgs->idle_cpus > busiest->idle_cpus)
> > + return false;
> > + if (sgs->idle_cpus < busiest->idle_cpus)
> > + return true;
> > + if (sgs->sum_nr_running <= busiest->sum_nr_running)
> > + return false;
> > + else
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > + goto fully_busy;
> > + break;
> > +
> > case group_fully_busy:
> > /*
> > * Select the fully busy group with highest avg_load. In
> > @@ -9763,7 +9777,7 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
> > * select the 1st one, except if @sg is composed of SMT
> > * siblings.
> > */
> > -
> > +fully_busy:
> > if (sgs->avg_load < busiest->avg_load)
> > return false;
> >
>
> Hi Tim, Peter.
>
> group_smt_balance(cluster scheduling), patches are in tip/sched/core. I dont
> see this above patch there yet. Currently as is, this can cause function difference
> in SMT4 systems( such as Power10).
>
> Can we please have the above patch as well in tip/sched/core?
>
> Acked-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Peter,
Just back from my long vacation. Wonder if you have any comments on the above patch
for fixing the SMT4 case?
Tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists