[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98296794-01e6-7192-ef3f-0ea454527aaf@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:26:28 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: chengming.zhou@...ux.dev, axboe@...nel.dk, ming.lei@...hat.com,
hch@....de
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhouchengming@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] blk-mq-tag: remove bt_for_each()
On 8/21/23 00:35, chengming.zhou@...ux.dev wrote:
> 2. __blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() has BT_TAG_ITER_STARTED flag set, so only
> started requests will be iterated, which should be more efficient.
The above motivation sounds wrong to me. The goal here should be not to
change the behavior of blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(). Although
blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() iterates over more requests than only started
requests, apparently blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() is only used to iterate
over started requests (blk_mq_request_started()). Please mention this in
the patch description.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists