linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq-tag: update or fix functions documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <01b61118-a192-dde2-09aa-de73f2ab2b5c@acm.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:32:54 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     chengming.zhou@...ux.dev, axboe@...nel.dk, ming.lei@...hat.com,
        hch@....de
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        zhouchengming@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq-tag: update or fix functions documentation

On 8/21/23 00:35, chengming.zhou@...ux.dev wrote:
> From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
> 
> There are some misleading or wrong documentation in the functions of
> blk-mq-tag, update it as we're here.

Are all changes in this patch updates for documentation that should have been
updated by commit 2dd6532e9591 ("blk-mq: Drop 'reserved' arg of busy_tag_iter_fn")?
If not, please move any unrelated changes into a separate patch.

Please also consider adding the following to this patch:

Fixes: 2dd6532e9591 ("blk-mq: Drop 'reserved' arg of busy_tag_iter_fn")

Thanks,

Bart.