linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Avoid possible buffer overflow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e07b89c3-4a1b-67e6-c434-7c8aef62d68e@nfschina.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:52:34 +0800
From:   Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        alexander.deucher@....com, christian.koenig@....com,
        Xinhui.Pan@....com, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch
Cc:     Hawking.Zhang@....com, le.ma@....com, lijo.lazar@....com,
        yifan1.zhang@....com, candice.li@....com, Yuliang.Shi@....com,
        guchun.chen@....com, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Avoid possible buffer overflow

On 2023/8/21 14:47, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 21/08/2023 à 08:19, Su Hui a écrit :
>> smatch error:
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c:1257 
>> amdgpu_discovery_reg_base_init() error:
>> testing array offset 'adev->vcn.num_vcn_inst' after use.
>>
>> change the assignment order to avoid buffer overflow.
>>
>> Fixes: c40bdfb2ffa4 ("drm/amdgpu: fix incorrect VCN revision in SRIOV")
>> Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c | 5 +++--
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c
>> index 8e1cfc87122d..ba95526c3d45 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c
>> @@ -1250,11 +1250,12 @@ static int 
>> amdgpu_discovery_reg_base_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>                    *     0b10 : encode is disabled
>>                    *     0b01 : decode is disabled
>>                    */
>> - adev->vcn.vcn_config[adev->vcn.num_vcn_inst] =
>> -                    ip->revision & 0xc0;
>> +
>>                   ip->revision &= ~0xc0;
>>                   if (adev->vcn.num_vcn_inst <
>>                       AMDGPU_MAX_VCN_INSTANCES) {
>> + adev->vcn.vcn_config[adev->vcn.num_vcn_inst] =
>> +                        ip->revision & 0xc0;
>
> Hi,
> I don't think that the patch is correct.
>
> Because of the "ip->revision &= ~0xc0" which is now above it, 
> "ip->revision & 0xc0" should now always be 0.
>
> Maybe both lines should be moved within the "if"?
>
> CJ

Hi,

Oh, really sorry for this, I just missed this line.
you are right, I will send v2 soon.
Thanks for your reminder!

Su Hui

>
>
>
>
>
>> adev->vcn.num_vcn_inst++;
>>                       adev->vcn.inst_mask |=
>>                           (1U << ip->instance_number);
>