linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Support 32_PCREL relocation type in kernel module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <mvmy1i4ako2.fsf@suse.de>
Date:   Mon, 21 Aug 2023 10:01:33 +0200
From:   Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
To:     Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@...ive.com>
Cc:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        jszhang@...nel.org, ajones@...tanamicro.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
        palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
        greentime.hu@...ive.com, zong.li@...ive.com, nylon7717@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Support 32_PCREL relocation type in kernel
 module

On Aug 21 2023, Nylon Chen wrote:

> If RISC-V were to support the unwind table in the future, would we
> need to re-enable it? Would this require implementing related
> changes(module relocation type handler) at that time?

I'm not quite sure I understand your question.  Nothing in the kernel
makes use of unwind tables on RISC-V, so there is no point in generating
them.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@...e.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."