[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZOMhq8a/wnURWsFP@lpieralisi>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 10:34:51 +0200
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
To: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@...ian.org>,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] PCI: brcmstb: Configure appropriate HW CLKREQ#
mode
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 10:40:53AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> v6 -- No code has been changed.
> -- Changed commit subject and comment in "#PERST" commit (Bjorn, Cyril)
> -- Changed sign-off and author email address for all commits.
> This was due to a change in Broadcom's upstreaming policy.
>
> v5 -- Remove DT property "brcm,completion-timeout-us" from
> "DT bindings" commit. Although this error may be reported
> as a completion timeout, its cause was traced to an
> internal bus timeout which may occur even when there is
> no PCIe access being processed. We set a timeout of four
> seconds only if we are operating in "L1SS CLKREQ#" mode.
> -- Correct CEM 2.0 reference provided by HW engineer,
> s/3.2.5.2.5/3.2.5.2.2/ (Bjorn)
> -- Add newline to dev_info() string (Stefan)
> -- Change variable rval to unsigned (Stefan)
> -- s/implementaion/implementation/ (Bjorn)
> -- s/superpowersave/powersupersave/ (Bjorn)
> -- Slightly modify message on "PERST#" commit.
> -- Rebase to torvalds master
>
> v4 -- New commit that asserts PERST# for 2711/RPi SOCs at PCIe RC
> driver probe() time. This is done in Raspian Linux and its
> absence may be the cause of a failing test case.
> -- New commit that removes stale comment.
>
> v3 -- Rewrote commit msgs and comments refering panics if L1SS
> is enabled/disabled; the code snippet that unadvertises L1SS
> eliminates the panic scenario. (Bjorn)
> -- Add reference for "400ns of CLKREQ# assertion" blurb (Bjorn)
> -- Put binding names in DT commit Subject (Bjorn)
> -- Add a verb to a commit's subject line (Bjorn)
> -- s/accomodat(\w+)/accommodat$1/g (Bjorn)
> -- Rewrote commit msgs and comments refering panics if L1SS
> is enabled/disabled; the code snippet that unadvertises L1SS
> eliminates the panic scenario. (Bjorn)
>
> v2 -- Changed binding property 'brcm,completion-timeout-msec' to
> 'brcm,completion-timeout-us'. (StefanW for standard suffix).
> -- Warn when clamping timeout value, and include clamped
> region in message. Also add min and max in YAML. (StefanW)
> -- Qualify description of "brcm,completion-timeout-us" so that
> it refers to PCIe transactions. (StefanW)
> -- Remvove mention of Linux specifics in binding description. (StefanW)
> -- s/clkreq#/CLKREQ#/g (Bjorn)
> -- Refactor completion-timeout-us code to compare max and min to
> value given by the property (as opposed to the computed value).
>
> v1 -- The current driver assumes the downstream devices can
> provide CLKREQ# for ASPM. These commits accomodate devices
> w/ or w/o clkreq# and also handle L1SS-capable devices.
>
> -- The Raspian Linux folks have already been using a PCIe RC
> property "brcm,enable-l1ss". These commits use the same
> property, in a backward-compatible manner, and the implementaion
> adds more detail and also automatically identifies devices w/o
> a clkreq# signal, i.e. most devices plugged into an RPi CM4
> IO board.
>
>
> Jim Quinlan (5):
> dt-bindings: PCI: brcmstb: Add brcm,enable-l1ss property
> PCI: brcmstb: Configure HW CLKREQ# mode appropriate for downstream
> device
I am not merging the first two patches since the discussion thread
is still open and I'd like to understand better what can/should be
done, sorry.
> PCI: brcmstb: Set higher value for internal bus timeout
> PCI: brcmstb: Assert PERST# on BCM2711
> PCI: brcmstb: Remove stale comment
Is it OK to apply these three on their own ? Overall it would be
great to avoid mixing patches with different end goals in a single
series.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> .../bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 9 ++
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 8a28a0b6f1a1dcbf5a834600a9acfbe2ba51e5eb
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists