[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230821102559.35c8ef51@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 10:25:59 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the ext4
tree
Hi all,
I missed a bit ...
On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 10:07:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/ext4/super.c
>
> between commit:
>
> e89c6fc9b191 ("ext4: cleanup ext4_get_dev_journal() and ext4_get_journal()")
>
> from the ext4 tree and commits:
>
> 1489dffd51d7 ("ext4: close the external journal device in ->kill_sb")
> 6f5fc7de9885 ("ext4: drop s_umount over opening the log device")
Also
8bed1783751f ("ext4: use fs_holder_ops for the log device")
> from the vfs-brauner tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc fs/ext4/super.c
index 1873de52c26e,73547d2334fd..34f5406c08da
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@@ -1096,34 -1097,26 +1097,6 @@@ void ext4_update_dynamic_rev(struct sup
*/
}
- static void ext4_bdev_mark_dead(struct block_device *bdev)
- {
- ext4_force_shutdown(bdev->bd_holder, EXT4_GOING_FLAGS_NOLOGFLUSH);
- }
-
- static const struct blk_holder_ops ext4_holder_ops = {
- .mark_dead = ext4_bdev_mark_dead,
- };
-
--/*
- * Release the journal device
- * Open the external journal device
-- */
- static void ext4_blkdev_remove(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi)
-static struct block_device *ext4_blkdev_get(dev_t dev, struct super_block *sb)
--{
-- struct block_device *bdev;
- bdev = sbi->s_journal_bdev;
- if (bdev) {
- /*
- * Invalidate the journal device's buffers. We don't want them
- * floating about in memory - the physical journal device may
- * hotswapped, and it breaks the `ro-after' testing code.
- */
- invalidate_bdev(bdev);
- blkdev_put(bdev, sbi->s_sb);
- sbi->s_journal_bdev = NULL;
- }
-
- bdev = blkdev_get_by_dev(dev, BLK_OPEN_READ | BLK_OPEN_WRITE, sb,
- &fs_holder_ops);
- if (IS_ERR(bdev))
- goto fail;
- return bdev;
-
-fail:
- ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
- "failed to open journal device unknown-block(%u,%u) %ld",
- MAJOR(dev), MINOR(dev), PTR_ERR(bdev));
- return NULL;
--}
--
static inline struct inode *orphan_list_entry(struct list_head *l)
{
return &list_entry(l, struct ext4_inode_info, i_orphan)->vfs_inode;
@@@ -5813,16 -5828,17 +5792,19 @@@ static struct block_device *ext4_get_jo
ext4_fsblk_t sb_block;
unsigned long offset;
struct ext4_super_block *es;
- struct block_device *bdev;
-
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ext4_has_feature_journal(sb)))
- return NULL;
+ int errno;
+ /* see get_tree_bdev why this is needed and safe */
+ up_write(&sb->s_umount);
- bdev = ext4_blkdev_get(j_dev, sb);
+ bdev = blkdev_get_by_dev(j_dev, BLK_OPEN_READ | BLK_OPEN_WRITE, sb,
- &ext4_holder_ops);
++ &fs_holder_ops);
+ down_write(&sb->s_umount);
- if (bdev == NULL)
- return NULL;
+ if (IS_ERR(bdev)) {
+ ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
+ "failed to open journal device unknown-block(%u,%u) %ld",
+ MAJOR(j_dev), MINOR(j_dev), PTR_ERR(bdev));
+ return ERR_CAST(bdev);
+ }
blocksize = sb->s_blocksize;
hblock = bdev_logical_block_size(bdev);
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists