[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZOK92_xLVsMmIEDE@swlinux02>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 09:29:58 +0800
From: Leo Liang <ycliang@...estech.com>
To: <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>
CC: <mingo@...hat.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<juri.lelli@...hat.com>, <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
<dietmar.eggemann@....com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
<bsegall@...gle.com>, <mgorman@...e.de>, <bristot@...hat.com>,
<vschneid@...hat.com>, <zhouchengming@...edance.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Fix cfs_rq_is_decayed() on !SMP
Hi Chengming,
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 09:21:48PM +0800, chengming.zhou@...ux.dev wrote:
> From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
>
> We don't need to maintain per-queue leaf_cfs_rq_list on !SMP, since
> it's used for cfs_rq load tracking & balance on SMP.
>
> But sched debug interface use it to print per-cfs_rq stats, which
> maybe better to change to use walk_tg_tree_from() instead.
>
> This patch just fix the !SMP version cfs_rq_is_decayed(), so the
> per-queue leaf_cfs_rq_list is also maintained correctly on !SMP,
> to fix the warning in assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq().
>
> Fixes: 0a00a354644e ("sched/fair: Delete useless condition in tg_unthrottle_up()")
> Reported-by: Leo Liang <ycliang@...estech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks for the quick patch!
Tested-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <ycliang@...estech.com>
Best regards,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists