linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Extend migrate_misplaced

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87cyzhdt5r.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Aug 2023 10:29:52 +0800
From:   "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        <shy828301@...il.com>, <david@...hat.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Extend migrate_misplaced_page() to support batch
 migration

Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Currently, on our ARM servers with NUMA enabled, we found the cross-die latency
> is a little larger that will significantly impact the workload's performance.
> So on ARM servers we will rely on the NUMA balancing to avoid the cross-die
> accessing. And I posted a patchset[1] to support speculative numa fault to
> improve the NUMA balancing's performance according to the principle of data
> locality. Moreover, thanks to Huang Ying's patchset[2], which introduced batch
> migration as a way to reduce the cost of TLB flush, and it will also benefit
> the migration of multiple pages all at once during NUMA balancing.
>
> So we plan to continue to support batch migration in do_numa_page() to improve
> the NUMA balancing's performance, but before adding complicated batch migration
> algorithm for NUMA balancing, some cleanup and preparation work need to do firstly,
> which are done in this patch set. In short, this patchset extends the
> migrate_misplaced_page() interface to support batch migration, and no functional
> changes intended.

Will these cleanup benefit anything except batching migration?  If not,
I suggest you to post the whole series.  In this way, people will be
more clear about why we need these cleanup.

--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1639306956.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com/t/#mc45929849b5d0e29b5fdd9d50425f8e95b8f2563
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230213123444.155149-1-ying.huang@intel.com/T/#u
>
> Baolin Wang (4):
>   mm: migrate: move migration validation into numa_migrate_prep()
>   mm: migrate: move the numamigrate_isolate_page() into do_numa_page()
>   mm: migrate: change migrate_misplaced_page() to support multiple pages
>     migration
>   mm: migrate: change to return the number of pages migrated
>     successfully
>
>  include/linux/migrate.h | 15 ++++++++---
>  mm/huge_memory.c        | 19 +++++++++++---
>  mm/memory.c             | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  mm/migrate.c            | 58 ++++++++---------------------------------
>  4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)