[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230822-tc358768-v3-5-c82405dac0c1@ideasonboard.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:19:38 +0300
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>,
Maxim Schwalm <maxim.schwalm@...il.com>,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@...com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 05/12] drm/bridge: tc358768: Cleanup PLL calculations
As is quite common, some of TC358768's PLL register fields are to be
programmed with (value - 1). Specifically, the FBD and PRD, multiplier
and divider, are such fields.
However, what the driver currently does is that it considers that the
formula used for PLL rate calculation is:
RefClk * [(FBD + 1)/ (PRD + 1)] * [1 / (2^FRS)]
where FBD and PRD are values directly from the registers, while a more
sensible way to look at it is:
RefClk * FBD / PRD * (1 / (2^FRS))
and when the FBD and PRD values are written to the registers, they will
be subtracted by one.
Change the driver accordingly, as it simplifies the PLL code.
Reviewed-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c
index 99992af23f1e..a465674f1e2e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static int tc358768_calc_pll(struct tc358768_priv *priv,
target_pll = tc358768_pclk_to_pll(priv, mode->clock * 1000);
- /* pll_clk = RefClk * [(FBD + 1)/ (PRD + 1)] * [1 / (2^FRS)] */
+ /* pll_clk = RefClk * FBD / PRD * (1 / (2^FRS)) */
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(frs_limits); i++)
if (target_pll >= frs_limits[i])
@@ -336,19 +336,19 @@ static int tc358768_calc_pll(struct tc358768_priv *priv,
best_prd = 0;
best_fbd = 0;
- for (prd = 0; prd < 16; ++prd) {
- u32 divisor = (prd + 1) * (1 << frs);
+ for (prd = 1; prd <= 16; ++prd) {
+ u32 divisor = prd * (1 << frs);
u32 fbd;
- for (fbd = 0; fbd < 512; ++fbd) {
+ for (fbd = 1; fbd <= 512; ++fbd) {
u32 pll, diff, pll_in;
- pll = (u32)div_u64((u64)refclk * (fbd + 1), divisor);
+ pll = (u32)div_u64((u64)refclk * fbd, divisor);
if (pll >= max_pll || pll < min_pll)
continue;
- pll_in = (u32)div_u64((u64)refclk, prd + 1);
+ pll_in = (u32)div_u64((u64)refclk, prd);
if (pll_in < 4000000)
continue;
@@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ static int tc358768_setup_pll(struct tc358768_priv *priv,
mode->clock * 1000);
/* PRD[15:12] FBD[8:0] */
- tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_PLLCTL0, (prd << 12) | fbd);
+ tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_PLLCTL0, ((prd - 1) << 12) | (fbd - 1));
/* FRS[11:10] LBWS[9:8] CKEN[4] RESETB[1] EN[0] */
tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_PLLCTL1,
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists