[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKEwX=OJLHBSk5F2TvFLTD1f-PMdKy50=GPHApj7eohtT8St5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:58:50 -0700
From: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests: cachestat: catch failing fsync test on tmpfs
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 8:55 AM Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 9:05 AM Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com> wrote:
> >
> > The cachestat kselftest runs a test on a normal file, which is created
> > temporarily in the current directory. Among the tests it runs there is a
> > call to fsync(), which is expected to clean all dirty pages used by the
> > file.
> > However the tmpfs filesystem implements fsync() as noop_fsync(), so the
> > call will not even attempt to clean anything when this test file happens
> > to live on a tmpfs instance. This happens in an initramfs, or when the
> > current directory is in /dev/shm or sometimes /tmp.
> >
> > To avoid this test failing wrongly, use statfs() to check which filesystem
> > the test file lives on. If that is "tmpfs", we skip the fsync() test.
> >
> > Since the fsync test is only one part of the "normal file" test, we now
> > execute this twice, skipping the fsync part on the first call.
> > This way only the second test, including the fsync part, would be skipped.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c | 62 ++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c
> > index 8f8f46c24846d..4804c7dc7b312 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c
> > @@ -4,10 +4,12 @@
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > #include <stdbool.h>
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/magic.h>
> > #include <linux/mman.h>
> > #include <sys/mman.h>
> > #include <sys/shm.h>
> > #include <sys/syscall.h>
> > +#include <sys/vfs.h>
> > #include <unistd.h>
> > #include <string.h>
> > #include <fcntl.h>
> > @@ -15,7 +17,7 @@
> >
> > #include "../kselftest.h"
> >
> > -#define NR_TESTS 8
> > +#define NR_TESTS 9
> >
> > static const char * const dev_files[] = {
> > "/dev/zero", "/dev/null", "/dev/urandom",
> > @@ -91,6 +93,20 @@ bool write_exactly(int fd, size_t filesize)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * fsync() is implemented via noop_fsync() on tmpfs. This makes the fsync()
> > + * test fail below, so we need to check for test file living on a tmpfs.
> > + */
> > +static bool is_on_tmpfs(int fd)
> > +{
> > + struct statfs statfs_buf;
> > +
> > + if (fstatfs(fd, &statfs_buf))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + return statfs_buf.f_type == TMPFS_MAGIC;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Open/create the file at filename, (optionally) write random data to it
> > * (exactly num_pages), then test the cachestat syscall on this file.
> > @@ -98,13 +114,13 @@ bool write_exactly(int fd, size_t filesize)
> > * If test_fsync == true, fsync the file, then check the number of dirty
> > * pages.
> > */
> > -bool test_cachestat(const char *filename, bool write_random, bool create,
> > - bool test_fsync, unsigned long num_pages, int open_flags,
> > - mode_t open_mode)
> > +static int test_cachestat(const char *filename, bool write_random, bool create,
> > + bool test_fsync, unsigned long num_pages,
> > + int open_flags, mode_t open_mode)
> > {
> Hmm would the semantic change a bit here?
>
> Previously, this function returned true if passed.
> But it seems like KSFT_PASS is defined as 0:
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/9e38be7/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h#L74
>
> So maybe we have to change from:
>
> if (test_<test-name>())
>
>
> to:
>
> if (!test_<test-name>)())
>
> or, explicitly as:
>
> if (test_<test-name>() == KSFT_PASS)
Ah never mind, ignore this. I didn't see your change
down in the main function.
Everything LGTM!
Acked-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
>
>
> > size_t PS = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
> > int filesize = num_pages * PS;
> > - bool ret = true;
> > + int ret = KSFT_PASS;
> > long syscall_ret;
> > struct cachestat cs;
> > struct cachestat_range cs_range = { 0, filesize };
> > @@ -113,7 +129,7 @@ bool test_cachestat(const char *filename, bool write_random, bool create,
> >
> > if (fd == -1) {
> > ksft_print_msg("Unable to create/open file.\n");
> > - ret = false;
> > + ret = KSFT_FAIL;
> > goto out;
> > } else {
> > ksft_print_msg("Create/open %s\n", filename);
> > @@ -122,7 +138,7 @@ bool test_cachestat(const char *filename, bool write_random, bool create,
> > if (write_random) {
> > if (!write_exactly(fd, filesize)) {
> > ksft_print_msg("Unable to access urandom.\n");
> > - ret = false;
> > + ret = KSFT_FAIL;
> > goto out1;
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -133,7 +149,7 @@ bool test_cachestat(const char *filename, bool write_random, bool create,
> >
> > if (syscall_ret) {
> > ksft_print_msg("Cachestat returned non-zero.\n");
> > - ret = false;
> > + ret = KSFT_FAIL;
> > goto out1;
> >
> > } else {
> > @@ -143,15 +159,17 @@ bool test_cachestat(const char *filename, bool write_random, bool create,
> > if (cs.nr_cache + cs.nr_evicted != num_pages) {
> > ksft_print_msg(
> > "Total number of cached and evicted pages is off.\n");
> > - ret = false;
> > + ret = KSFT_FAIL;
> > }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > if (test_fsync) {
> > - if (fsync(fd)) {
> > + if (is_on_tmpfs(fd)) {
> > + ret = KSFT_SKIP;
> > + } else if (fsync(fd)) {
> > ksft_print_msg("fsync fails.\n");
> > - ret = false;
> > + ret = KSFT_FAIL;
> > } else {
> > syscall_ret = syscall(__NR_cachestat, fd, &cs_range, &cs, 0);
> >
> > @@ -162,13 +180,13 @@ bool test_cachestat(const char *filename, bool write_random, bool create,
> > print_cachestat(&cs);
> >
> > if (cs.nr_dirty) {
> > - ret = false;
> > + ret = KSFT_FAIL;
> > ksft_print_msg(
> > "Number of dirty should be zero after fsync.\n");
> > }
> > } else {
> > ksft_print_msg("Cachestat (after fsync) returned non-zero.\n");
> > - ret = false;
> > + ret = KSFT_FAIL;
> > goto out1;
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -259,7 +277,7 @@ int main(void)
> > const char *dev_filename = dev_files[i];
> >
> > if (test_cachestat(dev_filename, false, false, false,
> > - 4, O_RDONLY, 0400))
> > + 4, O_RDONLY, 0400) == KSFT_PASS)
> > ksft_test_result_pass("cachestat works with %s\n", dev_filename);
> > else {
> > ksft_test_result_fail("cachestat fails with %s\n", dev_filename);
> > @@ -268,13 +286,27 @@ int main(void)
> > }
> >
> > if (test_cachestat("tmpfilecachestat", true, true,
> > - true, 4, O_CREAT | O_RDWR, 0400 | 0600))
> > + false, 4, O_CREAT | O_RDWR, 0600) == KSFT_PASS)
> > ksft_test_result_pass("cachestat works with a normal file\n");
> > else {
> > ksft_test_result_fail("cachestat fails with normal file\n");
> > ret = 1;
> > }
> >
> > + switch (test_cachestat("tmpfilecachestat", true, true,
> > + true, 4, O_CREAT | O_RDWR, 0600)) {
> > + case KSFT_FAIL:
> > + ksft_test_result_fail("cachestat fsync fails with normal file\n");
> > + ret = KSFT_FAIL;
> > + break;
> > + case KSFT_PASS:
> > + ksft_test_result_pass("cachestat fsync works with a normal file\n");
> > + break;
> > + case KSFT_SKIP:
> > + ksft_test_result_skip("tmpfilecachestat is on tmpfs\n");
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (test_cachestat_shmem())
> > ksft_test_result_pass("cachestat works with a shmem file\n");
> > else {
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists