[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023082212-pregnant-lizard-80e0@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:27:51 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/194] 6.1.47-rc1 review
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 05:51:27PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 05:27:02PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > [Adding Peter Zijlstra to CC]
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 04:25:22PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 at 01:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.47 release.
> > > > There are 194 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Aug 2023 19:40:45 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.47-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > >
> > > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> > >
> > >
> > > NOTE:
> > > Kernel warnings noticed on x86_64 while booting the kernel.
> > > Paul E. McKenney reported this last week [1] and discussions email
> > > thread provided here.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4dc3d0ec-b827-4bce-8927-cfa5d837fd03@paulmck-laptop/T/
> >
> > Seeing the same warning for the 6.1.47-rc1, which is missing
> > 4ae68b26c3ab ("objtool/x86: Fix SRSO mess"). Unfortunately the commit
> > will not apply cleanly to 6.1.y.
>
> I tried, and failed, let me try again...
>
> > I guess we need at least as well dbcdbdfdf137 ("objtool: Rework
> > instruction -> symbol mapping"), but not sure this is enough.
>
> That gets messy fast, I tried to backport all of the 6.4 objtool changes
> to 6.1, but ugh, the changes were highly intertwined with many other
> things.
Hm, I applied that, but now I get build errors:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: retbleed_return_thunk(): can't find starting instruction
and
incomplete ORC unwind tables in file: vmlinux
Failed to sort kernel tables
Attached below is my backport, what did I get wrong?
thanks,
greg k-h
View attachment "objtool-x86-fix-srso-mess.patch" of type "text/plain" (4969 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists