linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 04/11] PM / QoS: Decouple request alloc from dev_pm_qos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230822180208.95556-5-robdclark@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Aug 2023 11:01:51 -0700
From:   Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org (open list:HIBERNATION (aka Software Suspend,
        aka swsusp)), linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v5 04/11] PM / QoS: Decouple request alloc from dev_pm_qos_mtx

From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>

Similar to the previous patch, move the allocation out from under
dev_pm_qos_mtx, by speculatively doing the allocation and handle
any race after acquiring dev_pm_qos_mtx by freeing the redundant
allocation.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
---
 drivers/base/power/qos.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/qos.c b/drivers/base/power/qos.c
index 7e95760d16dc..09834f3354d7 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/qos.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/qos.c
@@ -930,8 +930,12 @@ s32 dev_pm_qos_get_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev)
 int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val)
 {
 	struct dev_pm_qos *qos = dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev);
+	struct dev_pm_qos_request *req = NULL;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	if (!qos->latency_tolerance_req)
+		req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req), GFP_KERNEL);
+
 	mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
 
 	dev_pm_qos_constraints_set(dev, qos);
@@ -945,8 +949,6 @@ int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val)
 		goto out;
 
 	if (!dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req) {
-		struct dev_pm_qos_request *req;
-
 		if (val < 0) {
 			if (val == PM_QOS_LATENCY_TOLERANCE_NO_CONSTRAINT)
 				ret = 0;
@@ -954,17 +956,15 @@ int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val)
 				ret = -EINVAL;
 			goto out;
 		}
-		req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!req) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
 			goto out;
 		}
 		ret = __dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev, req, DEV_PM_QOS_LATENCY_TOLERANCE, val);
-		if (ret < 0) {
-			kfree(req);
+		if (ret < 0)
 			goto out;
-		}
 		dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req = req;
+		req = NULL;
 	} else {
 		if (val < 0) {
 			__dev_pm_qos_drop_user_request(dev, DEV_PM_QOS_LATENCY_TOLERANCE);
@@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val)
 
  out:
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
+	kfree(req);
 	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance);
-- 
2.41.0