linux-kernel - Re: Question on __torture_rt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEXW_YS1F7-+0aVsEpqN=v54s1K+UjwtZG5Te1byfDeno=vL6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Aug 2023 14:52:15 -0400
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To:     paulmck@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question on __torture_rt_boost() else clause

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 1:46 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
[..]
> > > I am putting my best guess in the patch, and am including you on CC.
> >
> > Ok, thanks,
>
> On the other hand, it looks like I can now reproduce a qspinlock hang
> that happens maybe five to ten times a week across the entire fleet
> in a few tens of minutes.  On my laptop.  ;-)
>
> Now to start adding debug.  Which will affect the reproduction times,
> but life is like that sometimes...

I would be happy to review any locktorture changes that come out from
your qspinlock debug effort.

Thanks,

 - Joel