[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230822052326.GAZORGTrM6N7+6l+sl@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 07:23:26 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, David.Kaplan@....com,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/22] x86/srso: Fix srso_show_state() side effect
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 09:17:06AM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> I could do that, but this check ends up getting replaced by a later
> patch anyway.
>
> Would you want this comment in srso_select_mitigation()? After the next
> patch it has:
>
> bool has_microcode = boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_BRTYPE);
>
> Though that seems clear to me already.
Ok, good enough.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists