linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: dts: qcom: Add the rpmhpd header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e8bd304b-2ec9-cbdd-b5ad-f8a0ff552c77@quicinc.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Aug 2023 11:57:28 +0530
From:   Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     <agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: dts: qcom: Add the rpmhpd header


On 8/21/2023 8:44 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 10:55:02AM +0530, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>> Add the rpmhpd header having the definition of the regulator levels
>> for Qualcomm SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-sdx55.dtsi | 1 +
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-sdx65.dtsi | 1 +
>>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-sdx55.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-sdx55.dtsi
>> index df3cd9c..8ffb2a0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-sdx55.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-sdx55.dtsi
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>>   #include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdx55.h>
>>   #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>>   #include <dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/power/qcom,rpmhpd.h>
> If patch 4 isn't applied, aren't you going to get warnings about
> redefining the defines since you have them twice?
Isnt that just a macro so redefining wont give any warning. Please 
correct me if I am wrong.
But, I dont see any warnings while compiling without the 4th patch.

Thanks,
Rohit.
>>   #include <dt-bindings/soc/qcom,rpmh-rsc.h>
>>   
>>   / {
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-sdx65.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-sdx65.dtsi
>> index 1a35830..f990f5d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-sdx65.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-sdx65.dtsi
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>>   #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>>   #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>>   #include <dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/power/qcom,rpmhpd.h>
>>   #include <dt-bindings/soc/qcom,rpmh-rsc.h>
>>   #include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdx65.h>
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.7.4
>>