[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35f3aac5-7b8b-4cc7-9572-adf3d93e7a67@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 11:52:39 +0200
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: regulator: qcom,rpmh-regulator: allow i and
j as RPMh resource name suffix
Hi,
On 22/08/2023 11:42, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 22.08.2023 11:29, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 22.08.2023 11:28, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 22.08.2023 11:27, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>> Add "i" and "j" to the allowed subffix list as they can be used as RPMh
>>>> resource name suffixes on new platforms.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
>>>> ---
>>> Also 'n' and 'm' for 8550
>> Correction, the PMICs are indexed 'n' and 'm' but looks
>> like there are no RPMh-managed regulators on there
> Correction of the correction ;) there are some
Indeed, you're right, let's for for i, j, n & m then !
Neil
>
> Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists