[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12275754.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 13:28:02 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>,
Kajetan Puchalski <kajetan.puchalski@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1] cpuidle: teo: Avoid unnecessary variable assignments
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Notice that it is not necessary to assign tick_intercept_sum in every
iteration of the first loop over idle states in teo_select(), because
the intercept_sum value does not change after the assignment in a
given iteration of the loop, so its value after the last iteration of
the loop can be used for computing the tick_intercept_sum value
directly.
Modify the code accordingly.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
This is based on the pm-cpuidle-gov branch in linux-pm.git (which is included
into linux-next too).
---
drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
@@ -450,8 +450,6 @@ static int teo_select(struct cpuidle_dri
hit_sum += prev_bin->hits;
recent_sum += prev_bin->recent;
- tick_intercept_sum = intercept_sum;
-
if (dev->states_usage[i].disable)
continue;
@@ -484,7 +482,8 @@ static int teo_select(struct cpuidle_dri
goto end;
}
- tick_intercept_sum += cpu_data->state_bins[drv->state_count-1].intercepts;
+ tick_intercept_sum = intercept_sum +
+ cpu_data->state_bins[drv->state_count-1].intercepts;
/*
* If the sum of the intercepts metric for all of the idle states
Powered by blists - more mailing lists