[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230822113719.3551639-2-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 07:37:18 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>,
Manish Rangankar <mrangankar@...vell.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, njavali@...vell.com,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 2/3] scsi: qedi: Fix potential deadlock on &qedi_percpu->p_work_lock
From: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit dd64f80587190265ca8a0f4be6c64c2fda6d3ac2 ]
As &qedi_percpu->p_work_lock is acquired by hard IRQ qedi_msix_handler(),
other acquisitions of the same lock under process context should disable
IRQ, otherwise deadlock could happen if the IRQ preempts the execution
while the lock is held in process context on the same CPU.
qedi_cpu_offline() is one such function which acquires the lock in process
context.
[Deadlock Scenario]
qedi_cpu_offline()
->spin_lock(&p->p_work_lock)
<irq>
->qedi_msix_handler()
->edi_process_completions()
->spin_lock_irqsave(&p->p_work_lock, flags); (deadlock here)
This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am developing
for IRQ-related deadlocks.
The tentative patch fix the potential deadlock by spin_lock_irqsave()
under process context.
Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230726125655.4197-1-dg573847474@gmail.com
Acked-by: Manish Rangankar <mrangankar@...vell.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c b/drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c
index cc2152c56d355..96e470746767a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c
@@ -1981,8 +1981,9 @@ static int qedi_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
struct qedi_percpu_s *p = this_cpu_ptr(&qedi_percpu);
struct qedi_work *work, *tmp;
struct task_struct *thread;
+ unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_bh(&p->p_work_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&p->p_work_lock, flags);
thread = p->iothread;
p->iothread = NULL;
@@ -1993,7 +1994,7 @@ static int qedi_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
kfree(work);
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&p->p_work_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->p_work_lock, flags);
if (thread)
kthread_stop(thread);
return 0;
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists