linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the powerpc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023082218-pecan-chef-e4bc@gregkh>
Date:   Tue, 22 Aug 2023 13:51:50 +0200
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the powerpc tree

On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 02:58:26PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tty tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/fs_pd.h
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   e6e077cb2aa4 ("powerpc/include: Declare mpc8xx_immr in 8xx_immap.h")
>   fecc436a97af ("powerpc/include: Remove mpc8260.h and m82xx_pci.h")
>   fbbf4280dae4 ("powerpc/8xx: Remove immr_map() and immr_unmap()")
>   7768716d2f19 ("powerpc/cpm2: Remove cpm2_map() and cpm2_unmap()")
> 
> from the powerpc tree and commit:
> 
>   c2d6c1b4f034 ("serial: cpm_uart: Use get_baudrate() instead of uart_baudrate()")
> 
> from the tty tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> Note that after all the above are applied, it looks like this file can
> be removed completely as nothing in the tree includes it any more.

Thanks for the notice, I'll let the ppc developers remove it as it's in
their tree.

thanks,

greg k-h