[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZOSrDGujou8WwS5r@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:33:16 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, amadio@...stprotocols.net,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Guilherme Amadio <amadio@...too.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: perf tools: Options being passed to clang when building the BPF part
of skels
Hi,
On gentoo I'm noticing this:
clang-16clang-16: : clang-16error: : error: clang-16clang-16: clang-16clang-16clang-16: clang-16error: clang-16: : ignoring '-fstack-protector-strong' option as it is not currently supported for target 'bpf' [-Werror,-Woption-ignored]: : : clang-16error: ignoring '-fstack-protector-strong' option as it is not currently supported for target 'bpf' [-Werror,-Woption-ignored]error: error: :
error:
error: error: error: ignoring '-fstack-protector-strong' option as it is not currently supported for target 'bpf' [-Werror,-Woption-ignored]ignoring '-fstack-protector-strong' option as it is not currently supported for target 'bpf' [-Werror,-Woption-ignored]error: ignoring '-fstack-protector-strong' option as it is not currently supported for target 'bpf' [-Werror,-Woption-ignored]ignoring '-fstack-protector-strong' option as it is not currently supported for target 'bpf' [-Werror,-Woption-ignored]
ignoring '-fstack-protector-strong' option as it is not currently supported for target 'bpf' [-Werror,-Woption-ignored]ignoring '-fstack-protector-strong' option as it is not currently supported for target 'bpf' [-Werror,-Woption-ignored]ignoring '-fstack-protector-strong' option as it is not currently supported for target 'bpf' [-Werror,-Woption-ignored]ignoring '-fstack-protector-strong' option as it is not currently supported for target 'bpf' [-Werror,-Woption-ignored]
ignoring '-fstack-protector-strong' option as it is not currently supported for target 'bpf' [-Werror,-Woption-ignored]
And while just doing:
diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
index a5dd1ba..7726b57 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
+++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
@@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ else
endif
$(SKEL_TMP_OUT)/%.bpf.o: util/bpf_skel/%.bpf.c $(LIBBPF) $(SKEL_OUT)/vmlinux.h | $(SKEL_TMP_OUT)
- $(QUIET_CLANG)$(CLANG) -g -O2 --target=bpf -Wall -Werror $(BPF_INCLUDE) $(TOOLS_UAPI_INCLUDE) \
+ $(QUIET_CLANG)$(CLANG) -g -O2 --target=bpf -Wall -Werror -Wno-option-ignored $(BPF_INCLUDE) $(TOOLS_UAPI_INCLUDE) \
-c $(filter util/bpf_skel/%.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
$(SKEL_OUT)/%.skel.h: $(SKEL_TMP_OUT)/%.bpf.o | $(BPFTOOL)
"Fixes" it, I'm curious as where is that we're setting up the options
that are being passed to clang at:
tools/perf/Makefile.perf
$(SKEL_TMP_OUT)/%.bpf.o: util/bpf_skel/%.bpf.c $(LIBBPF) $(SKEL_OUT)/vmlinux.h | $(SKEL_TMP_OUT)
$(QUIET_CLANG)$(CLANG) -g -O2 --target=bpf -Wall -Werror $(BPF_INCLUDE) $(TOOLS_UAPI_INCLUDE) \
-c $(filter util/bpf_skel/%.bpf.c,$^) -o $@
Perhaps it is plain just using CFLAGS? I.e. maybe the native build
CFLAGS is being passed to the BPF target clang calls?
Ideas?
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists