linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq-tag: update or fix functions documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <af30544d-981a-ebc9-bed6-5cd979bc688d@linux.dev>
Date:   Tue, 22 Aug 2023 10:36:24 +0800
From:   Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, axboe@...nel.dk,
        ming.lei@...hat.com, hch@....de
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        zhouchengming@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq-tag: update or fix functions documentation

On 2023/8/22 05:32, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 8/21/23 00:35, chengming.zhou@...ux.dev wrote:
>> From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
>>
>> There are some misleading or wrong documentation in the functions of
>> blk-mq-tag, update it as we're here.
> 
> Are all changes in this patch updates for documentation that should have been
> updated by commit 2dd6532e9591 ("blk-mq: Drop 'reserved' arg of busy_tag_iter_fn")?
> If not, please move any unrelated changes into a separate patch.
> 
> Please also consider adding the following to this patch:
> 
> Fixes: 2dd6532e9591 ("blk-mq: Drop 'reserved' arg of busy_tag_iter_fn")
> 

Yes, most is related to that commit, will put into two patches.

Thanks.