| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20230822-arm64-gcs-v5-34-9ef181dd6324@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 14:57:07 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"Rick P. Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 34/37] kselftest/arm64: Add test coverage for GCS mode
locking
Verify that we can lock individual GCS mode bits, that other modes
aren't affected and as a side effect also that every combination of
modes can be enabled.
Normally the inability to reenable GCS after disabling it would be an
issue with testing but fortunately the kselftest_harness runs each test
within a fork()ed child. This can be inconvenient for some kinds of
testing but here it means that each test is in a separate thread and
therefore won't be affected by other tests in the suite.
Once we get toolchains with support for enabling GCS by default we will
need to take care to not do that in the build system but there are no
such toolchains yet so it is not yet an issue.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/.gitignore | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/Makefile | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c | 200 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/.gitignore
index 5810c4a163d4..0c86f53f68ad 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
basic-gcs
libc-gcs
+gcs-locking
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/Makefile
index a8fdf21e9a47..2173d6275956 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/Makefile
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
# nolibc.
#
-TEST_GEN_PROGS := basic-gcs libc-gcs
+TEST_GEN_PROGS := basic-gcs libc-gcs gcs-locking
LDLIBS+=-lpthread
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f6a73254317e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c
@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 ARM Limited.
+ *
+ * Tests for GCS mode locking. These tests rely on both having GCS
+ * unconfigured on entry and on the kselftest harness running each
+ * test in a fork()ed process which will have it's own mode.
+ */
+
+#include <limits.h>
+
+#include <sys/auxv.h>
+#include <sys/prctl.h>
+
+#include <asm/hwcap.h>
+
+#include "kselftest_harness.h"
+
+#include "gcs-util.h"
+
+#define my_syscall2(num, arg1, arg2) \
+({ \
+ register long _num __asm__ ("x8") = (num); \
+ register long _arg1 __asm__ ("x0") = (long)(arg1); \
+ register long _arg2 __asm__ ("x1") = (long)(arg2); \
+ register long _arg3 __asm__ ("x2") = 0; \
+ register long _arg4 __asm__ ("x3") = 0; \
+ register long _arg5 __asm__ ("x4") = 0; \
+ \
+ __asm__ volatile ( \
+ "svc #0\n" \
+ : "=r"(_arg1) \
+ : "r"(_arg1), "r"(_arg2), \
+ "r"(_arg3), "r"(_arg4), \
+ "r"(_arg5), "r"(_num) \
+ : "memory", "cc" \
+ ); \
+ _arg1; \
+})
+
+/* No mode bits are rejected for locking */
+TEST(lock_all_modes)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, ULONG_MAX, 0, 0, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+}
+
+FIXTURE(valid_modes)
+{
+};
+
+FIXTURE_VARIANT(valid_modes)
+{
+ unsigned long mode;
+};
+
+FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(valid_modes, enable)
+{
+ .mode = PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE,
+};
+
+FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(valid_modes, enable_write)
+{
+ .mode = PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE | PR_SHADOW_STACK_WRITE,
+};
+
+FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(valid_modes, enable_push)
+{
+ .mode = PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE | PR_SHADOW_STACK_PUSH,
+};
+
+FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(valid_modes, enable_write_push)
+{
+ .mode = PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE | PR_SHADOW_STACK_WRITE |
+ PR_SHADOW_STACK_PUSH,
+};
+
+FIXTURE_SETUP(valid_modes)
+{
+}
+
+FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(valid_modes)
+{
+}
+
+/* We can set the mode at all */
+TEST_F(valid_modes, set)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS,
+ variant->mode);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+ _exit(0);
+}
+
+/* Enabling, locking then disabling is rejected */
+TEST_F(valid_modes, enable_lock_disable)
+{
+ unsigned long mode;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS,
+ variant->mode);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &mode, 0, 0, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(mode, variant->mode);
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, variant->mode, 0, 0, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+ ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EBUSY);
+
+ _exit(0);
+}
+
+/* Locking then enabling is rejected */
+TEST_F(valid_modes, lock_enable)
+{
+ unsigned long mode;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, variant->mode, 0, 0, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+ ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS,
+ variant->mode);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EBUSY);
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &mode, 0, 0, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(mode, 0);
+
+ _exit(0);
+}
+
+/* Locking then changing other modes is fine */
+TEST_F(valid_modes, lock_enable_disable_others)
+{
+ unsigned long mode;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS,
+ variant->mode);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &mode, 0, 0, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(mode, variant->mode);
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, variant->mode, 0, 0, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+ ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS,
+ PR_SHADOW_STACK_ALL_MODES);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &mode, 0, 0, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(mode, PR_SHADOW_STACK_ALL_MODES);
+
+
+ ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS,
+ variant->mode);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &mode, 0, 0, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(mode, variant->mode);
+
+ _exit(0);
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ unsigned long mode;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!(getauxval(AT_HWCAP2) & HWCAP2_GCS))
+ ksft_exit_skip("SKIP GCS not supported\n");
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &mode, 0, 0, 0);
+ if (ret) {
+ ksft_print_msg("Failed to read GCS state: %d\n", ret);
+ return EXIT_FAILURE;
+ }
+
+ if (mode & PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE) {
+ ksft_print_msg("GCS was enabled, test unsupported\n");
+ return KSFT_SKIP;
+ }
+
+ return test_harness_run(argc, argv);
+}
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists