[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230823170806.GA11724@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 19:08:06 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] document while_each_thread(), change first_tid() to use
for_each_thread()
Add the comment to explain that while_each_thread(g,t) is not rcu-safe
unless g is stable (e.g. current). Even if g is a group leader and thus
can't exit before t, t or another sub-thread can exec and remove g from
the thread_group list.
The only lockless user of while_each_thread() is first_tid() and it is
fine in that it can't loop forever, yet for_each_thread() looks better
and I am going to change while_each_thread/next_thread.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 5 ++---
include/linux/sched/signal.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 9df3f4839662..69dbb03ad55b 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -3813,11 +3813,10 @@ static struct task_struct *first_tid(struct pid *pid, int tid, loff_t f_pos,
/* If we haven't found our starting place yet start
* with the leader and walk nr threads forward.
*/
- pos = task = task->group_leader;
- do {
+ for_each_thread(task, pos) {
if (!nr--)
goto found;
- } while_each_thread(task, pos);
+ };
fail:
pos = NULL;
goto out;
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/signal.h b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
index 0deebe2ab07d..0014d3adaf84 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
@@ -648,6 +648,10 @@ extern void flush_itimer_signals(void);
extern bool current_is_single_threaded(void);
+/*
+ * Without tasklist/siglock it is only rcu-safe if g can't exit/exec,
+ * otherwise next_thread(t) will never reach g after list_del_rcu(g).
+ */
#define while_each_thread(g, t) \
while ((t = next_thread(t)) != g)
--
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
Powered by blists - more mailing lists