lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 23 Aug 2023 14:52:58 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kselftest tree with the mm-hotfixes
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the kselftest tree got a conflict in:

  tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c

between commits:

  fbf31ed6e0f4 ("selftests: cachestat: test for cachestat availability")
  8d55633e168b ("selftests: cachestat: catch failing fsync test on tmpfs")

from the mm-hotfixes tree and commit:

  13eb52f6293d ("selftests: cachestat: test for cachestat availability")

from the kselftest tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the former version of the conflicting bits)
and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ