[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7ciZaH1KkGannC=69FgtyOO7M_1opu-xgdDCkske+en1jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 17:50:26 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf test: Add perf record sample filtering test
Hi Arnaldo,
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 10:42 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 02:30:18PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 07:58:22PM -0700, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > > $ sudo ./perf test 'sample filter' -v
> > > 94: perf record sample filtering (by BPF) tests :
> > > --- start ---
> > > test child forked, pid 3817527
> > > Checking BPF-filter privilege
> > > Basic bpf-filter test
> > > Basic bpf-filter test [Success]
> > > Failing bpf-filter test
> > > Error: task-clock event does not have PERF_SAMPLE_CPU
> > > Failing bpf-filter test [Success]
> > > Group bpf-filter test
> > > Error: task-clock event does not have PERF_SAMPLE_CPU
> > > Error: task-clock event does not have PERF_SAMPLE_CODE_PAGE_SIZE
> > > Group bpf-filter test [Success]
> > > test child finished with 0
> > > ---- end ----
> > > perf record sample filtering (by BPF) tests: Ok
> >
> > [root@...e ~]# perf test -v "by BPF"
> > 91: perf record sample filtering (by BPF) tests :
> > --- start ---
> > test child forked, pid 64165
> > Checking BPF-filter privilege
> > Basic bpf-filter test
> > ffffffff97f4f688
> > ffffffff97f73859
> > ffffffff97412ce6
> > ffffffff976da215
> > ffffffff973a92bf
> > ffffffff97376ad7
> > ffffffff97f73859
> <SNIP
> > ffffffff971fdca5
> > ffffffff9737dbc4
> > ffffffff971b4e04
> > Basic bpf-filter test [Failed invalid output]
> > test child finished with -1
> > ---- end ----
> > perf record sample filtering (by BPF) tests: FAILED!
> > [root@...e ~]#
> >
> > [root@...e ~]# uname -a
> > Linux five 6.2.15-100.fc36.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu May 11 16:51:53 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > [root@...e ~]#
>
> Above was on a AMD Ryzen 5950X, the following was on a lenovo t480s,
> Intel notebook:
Thanks for the test. I think it's a matter of the kernel version
rather than the CPU vendor. 6.1 or before will fail the check
in the beginning but 6.2 kernel lacks a feature to set sample
flags for some fields and silently accept all samples. IIRC it's
added in v6.3.
Probably I need to add a version check in the error path.
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> [root@...co ~]# uname -a
> Linux quaco 6.4.7-200.fc38.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jul 27 20:01:18 UTC 2023 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> [root@...co ~]# perf test "filter"
> 30: Filter hist entries : Ok
> 36: Filter fds with revents mask in a fdarray : Ok
> 67: dlfilter C API : Ok
> 91: perf record sample filtering (by BPF) tests : Ok
> [root@...co ~]# perf test -v "by BPF"
> 91: perf record sample filtering (by BPF) tests :
> --- start ---
> test child forked, pid 273609
> Checking BPF-filter privilege
> Basic bpf-filter test
> Basic bpf-filter test [Success]
> Failing bpf-filter test
> Error: task-clock event does not have PERF_SAMPLE_CPU
> Failing bpf-filter test [Success]
> Group bpf-filter test
> Error: task-clock event does not have PERF_SAMPLE_CPU
> Error: task-clock event does not have PERF_SAMPLE_CODE_PAGE_SIZE
> Group bpf-filter test [Success]
> test child finished with 0
> ---- end ----
> perf record sample filtering (by BPF) tests: Ok
> [root@...co ~]#
Powered by blists - more mailing lists