linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: crypto: qcom,prng: document SM8550

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dd3d28f1-ff5e-49e6-a9f7-0ec9265017cc@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:55:17 +0200
From:   Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To:     Om Prakash Singh <quic_omprsing@...cinc.com>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: crypto: qcom,prng: document SM8550

Hi,

On 23/08/2023 02:10, Om Prakash Singh wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/22/2023 9:34 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 22.08.2023 16:54, Om Prakash Singh wrote:
>>> PRNG Block on most of newer target from Qualcomm have some configuration where clock is configured by security firmware.
>>>
>>> Adding separate compatible string for each platform is overhead.
>>>
>>> We need to introduce common compatible string that can be used for all platforms with same configuration.
>>>
>>> I would suggest to use "qcom,rng-ee" for newer platform, dropping "p" also signifies it is not a Pseudo Random Number Generator.
>> Please reply inline and don't top-post.
>>
>>
>> Is this what you're trying to say?
>>
>> 1. sort out the clock requirements for designs where Linux manages it
>>     vs where the FW does so >
>> 2. introduce a new compatible for SoCs implementing a TRNG
>>
>> 3. for SoCs in 2., register the TRNG as a hwrng device
> 
> Yes to all

I can send a proposal, but that means writing a new driver for this compatible in drivers/char/hw_random/ right ?

Neil

> 
>>
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Konrad
> 
> Thanks,
> Om