[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <909a6669-01af-dbe7-b64b-84a5f3bc75a3@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:28:27 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Carlos Carvalho <carlos@...ica.ufpr.br>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, AceLan Kao <acelan@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Linux RAID <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
"yangerkun@...wei.com" <yangerkun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: Infiniate systemd loop when power off the machine with multiple
MD RAIDs
Hi,
在 2023/08/23 3:13, Carlos Carvalho 写道:
> Song Liu (song@...nel.org) wrote on Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 03:56:04PM -03:
>> >From systemd code, i.e. function delete_md(), this error:
>>
>> [ 205.957004] systemd-shutdown[1]: Stopping MD /dev/md124p1 (259:6).
>> [ 205.964177] systemd-shutdown[1]: Could not stop MD /dev/md124p1:
>> Device or resource busy
>>
>> is most likely triggered by ioctl(STOP_ARRAY).
>>
>> And based on the code, I think the ioctl fails here:
>>
>> if (cmd == STOP_ARRAY || cmd == STOP_ARRAY_RO) {
>> /* Need to flush page cache, and ensure no-one else opens
>> * and writes
>> */
>> mutex_lock(&mddev->open_mutex);
>> if (mddev->pers && atomic_read(&mddev->openers) > 1) {
>> mutex_unlock(&mddev->open_mutex);
>> err = -EBUSY;
>> goto out; ////////////////////// HERE
Yes, I suspect here as well, but I do some test with error injection to
gurantee that ioctl(STOP_ARRAY) always return -EBUSY, but I found that
system reboot didn't hang, it'll try a few times but eventually reboot
finished.
>> }
>> if (test_and_set_bit(MD_CLOSING, &mddev->flags)) {
>> mutex_unlock(&mddev->open_mutex);
>> err = -EBUSY;
>> goto out;
>> }
>> did_set_md_closing = true;
>> mutex_unlock(&mddev->open_mutex);
>> sync_blockdev(bdev);
>> }
>
> Probably. The problem is why doesn't it manage to flush the page cache? I find
> strange that the problem appears only when trying to stop the array, I get it
> when trying to umount the filesystem, where it also hangs because of the same
> reason. The kworker thread runs continuously using 100% cpu of only 1 core.
The kworker do you mean the daemon thread or the sync thread? runs
continuously using 100% cpu doen't sounds correct to me.
Thanks,
Kuai
>
> These are all similar symptoms of the underlying problem which I complained
> about days ago: the system doesn't manage to write to the disks, which stay
> nearly idle. If you wait long enough without issuing writes, which can be
> several hours, it'll eventually flush the page cache and proceed to a "normal"
> umount or reboot.
>
> The bug is dependent on the rate of writes and also on uptime; it rarely
> appears soon after boot, and increases as times passes.
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists