[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230823104143.760cc5bc@xps-13>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 10:41:43 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Martin Kurbanov <mmkurbanov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<kernel@...rdevices.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: spinand: micron: fixing the offset for OOB
Hi Martin,
mmkurbanov@...rdevices.ru wrote on Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:57:11 +0300:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On 22.08.2023 16:35, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > mmkurbanov@...rdevices.ru wrote on Tue, 22 Aug 2023 15:25:34 +0300:
> >
> >> The first 4 bytes are reserved for bad block data.
> >
> > Are you sure about that? I've never seen 4-bytes BBM.
>
> Yes, I'm sure. I have checked in all the relevant datasheets:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Name | Max Byte | Min Byte | Area | Description |
> | | Address | Address | | |
> |--------------------+----------+----------+---------+---------------------------|
> | MT29F2G01ABAGD [1] | | | | |
> |--------------------| | | | |
> | MT29F2G01ABBGD [2] | | | | |
> |--------------------| 803h | 800h | | |
> | MT29F1G01ABAFD [3] | | | | |
> |--------------------| | | | |
> | MT29F4G01ADAGD [4] | | | | |
> |--------------------+----------+----------| Spare 0 | Reserved (bad block data) |
> | MT29F4G01ABAFD [5] | | | | |
> |--------------------| | | | |
> | MT29F4G01ABBFD [6] | | | | |
> |--------------------| 1003h | 1000h | | |
> | MT29F8G01ADAFD [7] | | | | |
> |--------------------| | | | |
> | MT29F8G01ADBFD [8] | | | | |
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Note: to view the datasheet on the Micron (https://www.micron.com/) website, you need
> to register.
I don't think the four bytes have any "bad block specific" meaning. In
practice, the datasheet states:
Value programmed for bad block at the first byte of spare
area: 00h
So only the first byte is used to mark the block bad, the rest is
probably marked "reserved" for simplicity. I believe we should keep the
current layout because it would otherwise break users for no real
reason.
> Links:
> [1] https://datasheet.lcsc.com/lcsc/1912111437_Micron-Tech-MT29F2G01ABAGDWB-IT-G_C410863.pdf - page 45
> [2] https://www.micron.com/-/media/client/global/documents/products/data-sheet/nand-flash/70-series/m79a_2gb_1_8v_nand_spi.pdf - page 46
> [3] https://datasheet.lcsc.com/lcsc/2209201030_Micron-Tech-MT29F1G01ABAFDWB-IT-F_C2905686.pdf - page 46
> [4] https://www.micron.com/-/media/client/global/documents/products/data-sheet/nand-flash/70-series/m79a_ddp_4gb_3v_nand_spi.pdf - page 46
> [5] https://www.micron.com/-/media/client/global/documents/products/data-sheet/nand-flash/70-series/m70a_4gb_3v_nand_spi.pdf - page 47
> [6] https://www.micron.com/-/media/client/global/documents/products/data-sheet/nand-flash/70-series/m70a_4gb_1_8v_nand_spi.pdf - page 49
> [7] https://www.micron.com/-/media/client/global/documents/products/data-sheet/nand-flash/70-series/m70a_ddp_8gb_3v_nand_spi.pdf - page 48
> [8] https://www.micron.com/-/media/client/global/documents/products/data-sheet/nand-flash/70-series/m70a_ddp_8gb_1_8v_nand_spi.pdf - page 48
>
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists