[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegtqJo78wqT0EY0=1xfoSROsJogg9BNC_xJv6id9J1Oa+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 11:07:44 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Jiachen Zhang <zhangjiachen.jaycee@...edance.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
me@...x.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] fuse: writeback_cache consistency enhancement (writeback_cache_v2)
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 at 06:36, Jiachen Zhang
<zhangjiachen.jaycee@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> Some users may want both the high performance of the writeback_cahe mode
> and a little bit more consistency among FUSE mounts. Current
> writeback_cache mode never updates attributes from server, so can never
> see the file attributes changed by other FUSE mounts, which means
> 'zero-consisteny'.
>
> This commit introduces writeback_cache_v2 mode, which allows the attributes
> to be updated from server to kernel when the inode is clean and no
> writeback is in-progressing. FUSE daemons can select this mode by the
> FUSE_WRITEBACK_CACHE_V2 init flag.
>
> In writeback_cache_v2 mode, the server generates official attributes.
> Therefore,
>
> 1. For the cmtime, the cmtime generated by kernel are just temporary
> values that are never flushed to server by fuse_write_inode(), and they
> could be eventually updated by the official server cmtime. The
> mtime-based revalidation of the fc->auto_inval_data mode is also
> skipped, as the kernel-generated temporary cmtime are likely not equal
> to the offical server cmtime.
>
> 2. For the file size, we expect server updates its file size on
> FUSE_WRITEs. So we increase fi->attr_version in fuse_writepage_end() to
> check the staleness of the returning file size.
>
> Together with FOPEN_INVAL_ATTR, a FUSE daemon is able to implement
> close-to-open (CTO) consistency like NFS client implementations.
What I'd prefer is mode similar to NFS: getattr flushes pending writes
so that server ctime/mtime are always in sync with client. FUSE
probably should have done that from the beginning, but at that time I
wasn't aware of the NFS solution.
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists