linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/194] 6.1.47-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Aug 2023 11:26:23 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
        rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/194] 6.1.47-rc1 review

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 09:54:45AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 09:39:39PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.47 release.
> > There are 194 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 23 Aug 2023 19:40:45 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> Build test (gcc version 12.3.1 20230625):
> mips: 52 configs -> no failure
> arm: 100 configs -> no failure
> arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
> x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
> alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
> csky allmodconfig -> no failure
> powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
> riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
> s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
> xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
> 
> Boot test:
> x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. Warning on boot, already reported by others.
> x86_64: Booted on qemu. Warning on boot, already reported by others. [1]
> arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
> mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]
> 
> [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4765
> [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4773
> [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4772
> 
> Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
> 
> -- 
> Regards
> Sudip

One question about the warning on boot, all still works afterward,
right?  Or does the system not work?

thanks,

greg k-h