linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: socfpga: Explicitly include correct DT includes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Aug 2023 21:11:37 -0500
From:   Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: socfpga: Explicitly include correct DT includes



On 8/22/23 17:29, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 4:29 PM Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/17/23 17:54, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
>>> of_platform_bus_type before it was merged into the regular platform bus.
>>> As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
>>> "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
>>> and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
>>> files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
>>> replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
>>> explicitly include the correct includes.
>>>
>>
>> Applied!
> 
> Did you really? Doesn't look like this is in linux-next.

I did, but haven't sent a PR to armsoc. Will do it now, thanks for the 
reminder!

Dinh