[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <169279175547.797584.1233962438367558067.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:55:55 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: mark more local variables as volatile
On Wed, 09 Aug 2023 15:10:08 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A while ago I created a2305e3de8193 ("powerpc: mark local variables
> around longjmp as volatile") in order to allow building powerpc with
> -Wextra enabled on gcc-11.
>
> I tried this again with gcc-13 and found two more of the same issues,
> presumably based on slightly different optimization paths being taken
> here:
>
> [...]
Applied to powerpc/next.
[1/2] powerpc: mark more local variables as volatile
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/0f7ce21ab5209426b00636636a5f2d9008738654
[2/2] powerpc: xmon: remove unused variables
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/ef73dcaa31217c79adc548bf9045afb40ac75b82
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists