lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 23 Aug 2023 20:46:05 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>, airlied@...il.com,
        daniel@...ll.ch, bskeggs@...hat.com, kherbst@...hat.com,
        lyude@...hat.com, faith.ekstrand@...labora.com
Cc:     oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH drm-misc-next] drm/nouveau: uapi: don't pass NO_PREFETCH
 flag implicitly

Hi Danilo,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on ad1367f831f8743746a1f49705c28e36a7c95525]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Danilo-Krummrich/drm-nouveau-uapi-don-t-pass-NO_PREFETCH-flag-implicitly/20230823-074237
base:   ad1367f831f8743746a1f49705c28e36a7c95525
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230822234139.11185-1-dakr%40redhat.com
patch subject: [PATCH drm-misc-next] drm/nouveau: uapi: don't pass NO_PREFETCH flag implicitly
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230823/202308232030.0r1irPMu-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308232030.0r1irPMu-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> ./include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h:344: warning: Incorrect use of kernel-doc format:          * flags: the flags for this push buffer mapping
>> ./include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h:348: warning: Function parameter or member 'flags' not described in 'drm_nouveau_exec_push'

vim +344 ./include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h

   327	
   328	/**
   329	 * struct drm_nouveau_exec_push - EXEC push operation
   330	 *
   331	 * This structure represents a single EXEC push operation. UMDs should pass an
   332	 * array of this structure via struct drm_nouveau_exec's &push_ptr field.
   333	 */
   334	struct drm_nouveau_exec_push {
   335		/**
   336		 * @va: the virtual address of the push buffer mapping
   337		 */
   338		__u64 va;
   339		/**
   340		 * @va_len: the length of the push buffer mapping
   341		 */
   342		__u32 va_len;
   343		/**
 > 344		 * flags: the flags for this push buffer mapping
   345		 */
   346		__u32 flags;
   347	#define DRM_NOUVEAU_EXEC_PUSH_NO_PREFETCH 0x1
 > 348	};
   349	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ