[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a47e9615-aabf-4cc4-a479-430c309c3c8a@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 06:28:05 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/194] 6.1.47-rc1 review
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 09:03:49AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > For x86 I get the same runtime warning as everyone else.
>
> Yeah, this is troubling...
>
> Is it clang only? I'll dig into this today...
>
No, I build with gcc. More specifically, gcc 11.4.0 and binutils 2.40.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists