[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf7c7ab6-0907-2eea-bf9c-0811f8ec6c59@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 11:41:46 +0800
From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
To: Hao Xiang <hao.xiang@...ux.alibaba.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: shannon.zhao@...ux.alibaba.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
seanjc@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: emulate MSR_PLATFORM_INFO msr bits
On 8/21/2023 11:22 AM, Hao Xiang wrote:
> For intel platform, The BzyMhz field of Turbostat shows zero
> due to the missing of part msr bits of MSR_PLATFORM_INFO.
>
> Acquire necessary msr bits, and expose following msr info to guest,
> to make sure guest can get correct turbo frequency info.
>
> MSR_PLATFORM_INFO bits
> bit 15:8, Maximum Non-Turbo Ratio (MAX_NON_TURBO_LIM_RATIO)
> bit 47:40, Maximum Efficiency Ratio (MAX_EFFICIENCY_RATIO)
I'm curious. How are they related to turbo frequency info?
bits 15:8, tell the Non-turbo frequency and bits 47:40 tells the min
frequency.
> Signed-off-by: Hao Xiang <hao.xiang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index 1d11135..1c8a276 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -68,6 +68,10 @@
> #define MSR_PLATFORM_INFO 0x000000ce
> #define MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT_BIT 31
> #define MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT BIT_ULL(MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT_BIT)
> +/* MSR_PLATFORM_INFO bit 15:8, Maximum Non-Turbo Ratio (MAX_NON_TURBO_LIM_RATIO) */
> +#define MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_MAX_NON_TURBO_LIM_RATIO 0x00000000ff00
> +/* MSR_PLATFORM_INFO bit 47:40, Maximum Efficiency Ratio (MAX_EFFICIENCY_RATIO) */
> +#define MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_MAX_EFFICIENCY_RATIO 0xff0000000000
They are mask not the value, please name them with _MASK suffix.
>
> #define MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL 0xe1
> #define MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL_C02_DISABLE BIT(0)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index c381770..621c3e1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -1679,6 +1679,29 @@ static u64 kvm_get_arch_capabilities(void)
> return data;
> }
>
> +
> +static u64 kvm_get_msr_platform_info(void)
> +{
> + u64 msr_platform_info = 0;
> +
> + rdmsrl_safe(MSR_PLATFORM_INFO, &msr_platform_info);
> + /*
> + * MSR_PLATFORM_INFO bits:
> + * bit 15:8, Maximum Non-Turbo Ratio (MAX_NON_TURBO_LIM_RATIO)
> + * bit 31, CPUID Faulting Enabled (CPUID_FAULTING_EN)
> + * bit 47:40, Maximum Efficiency Ratio (MAX_EFFICIENCY_RATIO)
> + *
> + * Emulate part msr bits, expose above msr info to guest,
> + * to make sure guest can get correct turbo frequency info.
> + */
> +
> + msr_platform_info &= (MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_MAX_NON_TURBO_RATIO |
> + MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_MAX_EFFICIENCY_RATIO);
> + msr_platform_info |= MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT;
> +
> + return msr_platform_info;
> +}
> +
> static int kvm_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
> {
> switch (msr->index) {
> @@ -11919,7 +11942,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> goto free_guest_fpu;
>
> vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities = kvm_get_arch_capabilities();
> - vcpu->arch.msr_platform_info = MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT;
> + vcpu->arch.msr_platform_info = kvm_get_msr_platform_info();
> kvm_xen_init_vcpu(vcpu);
> kvm_vcpu_mtrr_init(vcpu);
> vcpu_load(vcpu);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists