[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZOYxGhZxpTDUpURQ@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 19:17:30 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@...il.com>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iio: pressure: bmp280: Use uint8 to store chip ids
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 07:10:33PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 05:58:05PM +0200, Angel Iglesias wrote:
> > Represent the device id reg values using uint8 to optimize memory use.
>
> This doesn't correspond to the code, in the code you used uint8_t.
...
> > struct bmp280_chip_info {
> > unsigned int id_reg;
> > - const unsigned int chip_id;
> > + uint8_t chip_id;
>
> While this will compile and even work properly in kernel we use uXX types,
> here u8.
Actually this patch doesn't optimize memory use. The alignment will create
a gap anyway.
That said, this patch is simply redundant.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists