[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZOe3e7xFfWLd5aHx@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 21:03:07 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>
Cc: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: userspace-consumer: Use atomic operation
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 12:32:22PM -0700, Zev Weiss wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 09:55:41AM PDT, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Unless there's a strong positive reason to specifically use atomics it
> > seems better to avoid them, like I say they're full of landmines with
> > unexpeted behaviours and therefore something that sets off alarm bells
> > about needing careful study, the mutex is going to be less preformant
> > but is also much more clearly correct.
> I assume this patch was posted as a result of a comment I made on the
> original patch [1], but in hindsight I probably shouldn't have suggested it
I'm literally on a train right now with very intermittent connectivity:
Please include human readable descriptions of things like commits and
issues being discussed in e-mail in your mails, this makes them much
easier for humans to read especially when they have no internet access.
I do frequently catch up on my mail on flights or while otherwise
travelling so this is even more pressing for me than just being about
making things a bit easier to read.
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/d3ea0fe2-00bb-493b-aca7-ba7a31bd3c78@hatter.bewilderbeest.net/
That's review of "regulator: userspace-consumer: Add regulator event
support". Sorry, I had managed to reply on that thread but it keeps
getting buried under an avalanche of enormous serieses.
> as it's a relatively minor issue either way -- I think the other things
> brought up in that email are much more significant concerns. Honestly I
> don't think that patch should be applied in its present form, though I see
> it's still present in the regulator/for-next and regulator/for-6.6 branches
> -- Mark, do you intend to include it as-is in your pull request to Linus for
> the 6.6 merge window?
If it's there I'm intending to include it, though I'm still thinking
about the numbers.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists