linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 16/45] rcu: dynamically allocate the rcu-kfree shrinker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230824034304.37411-17-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Aug 2023 11:42:35 +0800
From:   Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
To:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...morbit.com, tkhai@...ru,
        vbabka@...e.cz, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, djwong@...nel.org,
        brauner@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
        steven.price@....com, cel@...nel.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org,
        yujie.liu@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        muchun.song@...ux.dev
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 16/45] rcu: dynamically allocate the rcu-kfree shrinker

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the rcu-kfree shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
CC: rcu@...r.kernel.org
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index cb1caefa8bd0..6d2f82f79c65 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3449,13 +3449,6 @@ kfree_rcu_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
 	return freed == 0 ? SHRINK_STOP : freed;
 }
 
-static struct shrinker kfree_rcu_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects = kfree_rcu_shrink_count,
-	.scan_objects = kfree_rcu_shrink_scan,
-	.batch = 0,
-	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-};
-
 void __init kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
@@ -4931,6 +4924,7 @@ static void __init kfree_rcu_batch_init(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
 	int i, j;
+	struct shrinker *kfree_rcu_shrinker;
 
 	/* Clamp it to [0:100] seconds interval. */
 	if (rcu_delay_page_cache_fill_msec < 0 ||
@@ -4962,8 +4956,18 @@ static void __init kfree_rcu_batch_init(void)
 		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&krcp->page_cache_work, fill_page_cache_func);
 		krcp->initialized = true;
 	}
-	if (register_shrinker(&kfree_rcu_shrinker, "rcu-kfree"))
-		pr_err("Failed to register kfree_rcu() shrinker!\n");
+
+	kfree_rcu_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "rcu-kfree");
+	if (!kfree_rcu_shrinker) {
+		pr_err("Failed to allocate kfree_rcu() shrinker!\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	kfree_rcu_shrinker->count_objects = kfree_rcu_shrink_count;
+	kfree_rcu_shrinker->scan_objects = kfree_rcu_shrink_scan;
+	kfree_rcu_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+
+	shrinker_register(kfree_rcu_shrinker);
 }
 
 void __init rcu_init(void)
-- 
2.30.2