[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230824044818.GDZObhEh3MWZN8vcfW@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 06:48:18 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, David.Kaplan@....com,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/22] x86/srso: Print mitigation for retbleed IBPB case
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 06:19:07PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> When overriding the requested mitigation with IBPB due to retbleed=ibpb,
> print the actual mitigation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index da480c089739..4e332707a343 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -2427,7 +2427,7 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void)
> if (has_microcode) {
> pr_info("Retbleed IBPB mitigation enabled, using same for SRSO\n");
This print was supposed to do that. Now you have two for the IBPB case.
If you want to print it using the usual format, then whack the above.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists