[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230824064508.968142-1-masahiroy@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 15:45:08 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: single: remove get rid of __maybe_unused
These are always used in pcs_probe().
While I was here, I also changed 'unsigned' in the same line to
'unsigned int' to address the checkpatch warnings:
WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
index 0dabbcf68b9f..51783fa62c1c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -240,32 +240,32 @@ static struct lock_class_key pcs_request_class;
* does not help in this case.
*/
-static unsigned __maybe_unused pcs_readb(void __iomem *reg)
+static unsigned int pcs_readb(void __iomem *reg)
{
return readb(reg);
}
-static unsigned __maybe_unused pcs_readw(void __iomem *reg)
+static unsigned int pcs_readw(void __iomem *reg)
{
return readw(reg);
}
-static unsigned __maybe_unused pcs_readl(void __iomem *reg)
+static unsigned int pcs_readl(void __iomem *reg)
{
return readl(reg);
}
-static void __maybe_unused pcs_writeb(unsigned val, void __iomem *reg)
+static void pcs_writeb(unsigned int val, void __iomem *reg)
{
writeb(val, reg);
}
-static void __maybe_unused pcs_writew(unsigned val, void __iomem *reg)
+static void pcs_writew(unsigned int val, void __iomem *reg)
{
writew(val, reg);
}
-static void __maybe_unused pcs_writel(unsigned val, void __iomem *reg)
+static void pcs_writel(unsigned int val, void __iomem *reg)
{
writel(val, reg);
}
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists