[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230824095001.3408573-2-pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 09:49:55 +0000
From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...weicloud.com>
To: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>,
Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>,
Pu Lehui <pulehui@...weicloud.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/7] riscv, bpf: Fix missing exception handling and redundant zext for LDX_B/H/W
From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>
For LDX_B/H/W, when zext has been inserted by verifier, it'll return 1,
and no exception handling will continue. Also, when the offset is 12-bit
value, the redundant zext inserted by the verifier is not removed. Fix
both scenarios by moving down the removal of redundant zext.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>
---
arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 0ca4f5c0097c..f2644e7ea6b5 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -1512,8 +1512,6 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
insns_start = ctx->ninsns;
emit(rv_lbu(rd, 0, RV_REG_T1), ctx);
insn_len = ctx->ninsns - insns_start;
- if (insn_is_zext(&insn[1]))
- return 1;
break;
case BPF_H:
if (is_12b_int(off)) {
@@ -1528,8 +1526,6 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
insns_start = ctx->ninsns;
emit(rv_lhu(rd, 0, RV_REG_T1), ctx);
insn_len = ctx->ninsns - insns_start;
- if (insn_is_zext(&insn[1]))
- return 1;
break;
case BPF_W:
if (is_12b_int(off)) {
@@ -1544,8 +1540,6 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
insns_start = ctx->ninsns;
emit(rv_lwu(rd, 0, RV_REG_T1), ctx);
insn_len = ctx->ninsns - insns_start;
- if (insn_is_zext(&insn[1]))
- return 1;
break;
case BPF_DW:
if (is_12b_int(off)) {
@@ -1566,6 +1560,9 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
ret = add_exception_handler(insn, ctx, rd, insn_len);
if (ret)
return ret;
+
+ if (BPF_SIZE(code) != BPF_DW && insn_is_zext(&insn[1]))
+ return 1;
break;
}
/* speculation barrier */
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists